The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

'Carbon footprinting': towards a universally accepted definition

'Carbon footprinting': towards a universally accepted definition
'Carbon footprinting': towards a universally accepted definition
As the threat of climate change becomes more acute, so does the need for adequate measures of impact(s), management and mitigation. Although carbon footprints are increasingly being used by organizations in the public and private sectors, a number of challenges and questions need to be addressed, not least, what does the term carbon footprint actually mean? The term needs a universally accepted definition before a consistent, accurate, comparable and transferable methodology can be developed. This paper investigates the range of current definitions proposed for a carbon footprint in the context of inventoried emissions, applications, boundaries and limitations. We argue that to only account for CO2 emissions would result in the omission of almost one-quarter of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and a significant gap in their global management, whilst inclusion of all GHGs is very time-consuming and expensive, and should be considered only in system specific life cycle assessment (LCA) based assessments; this requires a separate definition, name and methodology. We suggest that as data collection for CO2 and CH4 emissions is relatively straightforward, these two carbon based gases should be used in the determination of a ‘carbon footprint.’ This should allow the carbon footprint to become a cost-effective, practical and repeatable metric that can be adopted by all types of organizations across the globe as a “baseline” indicator. However, it is likely that a more comprehensive metric will be required in some circumstances and by some organizations, so we also propose further GHG inclusion for full LCA based assessments, where complete data is obtainable it can be used to provide a ‘climate footprint’. This name reflects the addition of non-carbon based gases and encompasses the full range of gases used in the global political community’s response in managing climate change. We conclude by considering lessons learnt with the proposal of sound and pragmatic definitions
1758-3004
61-72
Wright, Laurence A.
3a2a1796-eec1-4752-9d57-b8dd882e37bd
Kemp, Simon
942b35c0-3584-4ca1-bf9e-5f07790d6e36
Williams, Ian
c9d674ac-ee69-4937-ab43-17e716266e22
Wright, Laurence A.
3a2a1796-eec1-4752-9d57-b8dd882e37bd
Kemp, Simon
942b35c0-3584-4ca1-bf9e-5f07790d6e36
Williams, Ian
c9d674ac-ee69-4937-ab43-17e716266e22

Wright, Laurence A., Kemp, Simon and Williams, Ian (2011) 'Carbon footprinting': towards a universally accepted definition. Carbon Management, 2 (1), 61-72. (doi:10.4155/cmt.10.39).

Record type: Article

Abstract

As the threat of climate change becomes more acute, so does the need for adequate measures of impact(s), management and mitigation. Although carbon footprints are increasingly being used by organizations in the public and private sectors, a number of challenges and questions need to be addressed, not least, what does the term carbon footprint actually mean? The term needs a universally accepted definition before a consistent, accurate, comparable and transferable methodology can be developed. This paper investigates the range of current definitions proposed for a carbon footprint in the context of inventoried emissions, applications, boundaries and limitations. We argue that to only account for CO2 emissions would result in the omission of almost one-quarter of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and a significant gap in their global management, whilst inclusion of all GHGs is very time-consuming and expensive, and should be considered only in system specific life cycle assessment (LCA) based assessments; this requires a separate definition, name and methodology. We suggest that as data collection for CO2 and CH4 emissions is relatively straightforward, these two carbon based gases should be used in the determination of a ‘carbon footprint.’ This should allow the carbon footprint to become a cost-effective, practical and repeatable metric that can be adopted by all types of organizations across the globe as a “baseline” indicator. However, it is likely that a more comprehensive metric will be required in some circumstances and by some organizations, so we also propose further GHG inclusion for full LCA based assessments, where complete data is obtainable it can be used to provide a ‘climate footprint’. This name reflects the addition of non-carbon based gases and encompasses the full range of gases used in the global political community’s response in managing climate change. We conclude by considering lessons learnt with the proposal of sound and pragmatic definitions

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2011
Organisations: Centre for Environmental Science

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 210245
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/210245
ISSN: 1758-3004
PURE UUID: f6836a00-1205-4456-af00-41eda83fa14d
ORCID for Ian Williams: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0121-1219

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 08 Feb 2012 09:49
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:22

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Laurence A. Wright
Author: Simon Kemp
Author: Ian Williams ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×