The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Kinetic equations for diffusion-controlled precipitation reactions

Kinetic equations for diffusion-controlled precipitation reactions
Kinetic equations for diffusion-controlled precipitation reactions
In the past it has been suggested that the Johnson-Mehl-Avrami Kolmogorov (JMAK) equation can be used to describe the progress of a large number of nucleation and growth reactions, including diffusion-controlled precipitation reactions, provided that nucleation is random. However, its validity has only been proved for reactions with a linear growth and not for diffusion-controlled precipitation reactions. Here, the ability of the JMAK equation to fit the experimental data of diffusion-controlled precipitation reactions has been compared with the Austin-Rickett (AR) equation ?=1?{[k(T)t]n+1}-1 In all cases studied the AR equation provides a better fit to the data and the obtained integer and half-integer values of n can be interpreted in terms of the physics of the transformation processes. The latter is mostly not possible for n values obtained from the JMAK equation. It is concluded that for the purpose of interpreting data of precipitation reactions, the AR equation is more appropriate than the JMAK equation.
Note: See www.eprints.soton.ac.uk/18827/ for improved analysis.
0022-2461
4061-4070
Starink, M.J.
fe61a323-4e0c-49c7-91f0-4450e1ec1e51
Starink, M.J.
fe61a323-4e0c-49c7-91f0-4450e1ec1e51

Starink, M.J. (1997) Kinetic equations for diffusion-controlled precipitation reactions. Journal of Materials Science, 32 (15), 4061-4070. (doi:10.1023/A:1018649823542).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In the past it has been suggested that the Johnson-Mehl-Avrami Kolmogorov (JMAK) equation can be used to describe the progress of a large number of nucleation and growth reactions, including diffusion-controlled precipitation reactions, provided that nucleation is random. However, its validity has only been proved for reactions with a linear growth and not for diffusion-controlled precipitation reactions. Here, the ability of the JMAK equation to fit the experimental data of diffusion-controlled precipitation reactions has been compared with the Austin-Rickett (AR) equation ?=1?{[k(T)t]n+1}-1 In all cases studied the AR equation provides a better fit to the data and the obtained integer and half-integer values of n can be interpreted in terms of the physics of the transformation processes. The latter is mostly not possible for n values obtained from the JMAK equation. It is concluded that for the purpose of interpreting data of precipitation reactions, the AR equation is more appropriate than the JMAK equation.
Note: See www.eprints.soton.ac.uk/18827/ for improved analysis.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1997

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 21705
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/21705
ISSN: 0022-2461
PURE UUID: 38093e9a-7fb8-4bab-9a9e-9256c9b16b20

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Jan 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:32

Export record

Altmetrics

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×