The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Patient recollections of day case knee arthroscopy procedure

Madan, Sanjeev, Kulkarni, Shrikanth, Freidrichs, Ilka and Barrett, David S. (2002) Patient recollections of day case knee arthroscopy procedure Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases, 60, (2), pp. 76-79.

Record type: Article

Abstract

A prospective study of 103 consecutive patients who underwent day case knee arthroscopy was performed. The purpose was to evaluate the information delivery system, patient comprehension, and issues of informed consent pertaining to day case arthroscopy procedures. There were 34 females and 69 males in the study group and their mean age was 38.6 years (range: 14.4 to 74.9 years). The diagnosis, procedure, and aftercare were explained to the patients in the outpatients clinic by a trained nurse and by the operating surgeon just prior to the operation. The nurse before the operation gave the patients an information booklet. Postoperatively the patients were informed about the findings and diagnosis prior to their discharge from the day care facility. Patients were requested to complete a questionnaire. Three weeks later they were given the same questionnaire, prior to consultation, in the outpatient clinic. These two forms were compared with the operative findings and diagnosis documented in the copy of the questionnaire completed by the surgeon as well as the case notes. Most patients (38.8%; 40 patients) had no recollection; 3.9% (4 patients) had partial recollection at their consultation three weeks later; 19.4% (20 patients) found that the arthroscopic photograph was not helpful in making them understand the procedure; and 9.7% (10 patients) found the information booklet to be unhelpful. Further, 23.3% (24 patients) said that it would not help if the booklet were sent to them prior to the operation. The recollection rate was also correlated to their position on the operating list, to ascertain the effect of the anesthetic. There was a 65.9% (58 patients) recollection rate in those patients who were on the first half of the list and there was only a 33.33% recollection rate in those patients who were last or second to the last [p = 0.0225]. We recommend regular evaluation and improvement in the communication and information delivery system provided to patients.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 2002

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 22355
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/22355
ISSN: 0018-5647
PURE UUID: 435e4303-3b59-4098-a734-0cfb6799ca69

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 12 Feb 2007
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 16:22

Export record

Contributors

Author: Sanjeev Madan
Author: Shrikanth Kulkarni
Author: Ilka Freidrichs

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×