The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Should the cement mantle around the femoral component be thick or thin?

Should the cement mantle around the femoral component be thick or thin?
Should the cement mantle around the femoral component be thick or thin?
We have compared the survival and radiological outcome at ten years after total hip replacement using two techniques for preparing the femoral canal. The same prosthesis was used throughout and all operations were performed by the same surgical team. In technique 1 the canal was over-reamed by 2 mm and in technique 2 it was reamed to the same size as the prosthesis. Technique 1 was performed on 92 patients and technique 2 on 97 patients. The survival at ten years was 97.2% (90.6 to 99.2) for technique 1 and 98.8% (92.9 to 99.8) for technique 2. Vertical migration was greater in technique 1 (1.8 mm versus 1.0 mm at five years; p = 0.36). There were significantly more lytic lesions and radiolucent lines at five years (p = 0.0061) with technique 1. We conclude that technique 2 is not worse and may produce better long- term results than current teaching suggests.
0301-620X
45-51
Skinner, J.A.
0ed53085-b3a1-4117-9e54-63c155f1b5ba
Todo, S.
cf9a5756-f9c9-4c71-9246-f3a0d78bd1c6
Taylor, M.
e368bda3-6ca5-4178-80e9-41a689badeeb
Wang, J.S.
7e4a5e34-22d9-4dd2-9d39-80292b6c5d29
Pinskerova, V.
b8c7a40e-a8e6-4f0c-845c-4d26a418457f
Scott, G.
04ce5261-a199-4be1-8454-eb72750a8499
Skinner, J.A.
0ed53085-b3a1-4117-9e54-63c155f1b5ba
Todo, S.
cf9a5756-f9c9-4c71-9246-f3a0d78bd1c6
Taylor, M.
e368bda3-6ca5-4178-80e9-41a689badeeb
Wang, J.S.
7e4a5e34-22d9-4dd2-9d39-80292b6c5d29
Pinskerova, V.
b8c7a40e-a8e6-4f0c-845c-4d26a418457f
Scott, G.
04ce5261-a199-4be1-8454-eb72750a8499

Skinner, J.A., Todo, S., Taylor, M., Wang, J.S., Pinskerova, V. and Scott, G. (2003) Should the cement mantle around the femoral component be thick or thin? Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 85B (1), 45-51. (doi:10.1302/0301-620X.85B1.13055).

Record type: Article

Abstract

We have compared the survival and radiological outcome at ten years after total hip replacement using two techniques for preparing the femoral canal. The same prosthesis was used throughout and all operations were performed by the same surgical team. In technique 1 the canal was over-reamed by 2 mm and in technique 2 it was reamed to the same size as the prosthesis. Technique 1 was performed on 92 patients and technique 2 on 97 patients. The survival at ten years was 97.2% (90.6 to 99.2) for technique 1 and 98.8% (92.9 to 99.8) for technique 2. Vertical migration was greater in technique 1 (1.8 mm versus 1.0 mm at five years; p = 0.36). There were significantly more lytic lesions and radiolucent lines at five years (p = 0.0061) with technique 1. We conclude that technique 2 is not worse and may produce better long- term results than current teaching suggests.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2003
Additional Information: British volume
Organisations: Engineering Sciences

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 22359
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/22359
ISSN: 0301-620X
PURE UUID: dfffcda0-907e-4568-ad46-a43f7566df0f

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 24 Mar 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: J.A. Skinner
Author: S. Todo
Author: M. Taylor
Author: J.S. Wang
Author: V. Pinskerova
Author: G. Scott

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×