The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Assessment of common turbulence models for an idealised adverse pressure gradient flow

Assessment of common turbulence models for an idealised adverse pressure gradient flow
Assessment of common turbulence models for an idealised adverse pressure gradient flow
Results from direct numerical simulation (DNS) of Re?=390 channel flow subjected to the strain and deceleration typical of adverse pressure gradients (APGs), to the point of skin-friction reversal, are the reference for comparing four simple turbulence models. The statistics satisfy a one-dimensional unsteady problem and contain many of the physical complications associated with APGs, thus allowing a straightforward but nontrivial assessment of the models for APG flows, with rigorously defined boundary and initial conditions and an acceptable Reynolds number. We find the model accuracy varies significantly, with the Spalart–Allmaras and Menter SST schemes giving the best overall agreement with DNS. The other two models tested (Baldwin–Lomax and Launder–Sharma) deviate from the DNS, in terms of skin friction, much the same way they do in actual spatially developing APG boundary layers. This supports the relevance of the strained-channel idealisation. The DNS results are used to examine fundamental assumptions of the four models, casting light on the relative strengths and weaknesses of each.
0997-7546
319-337
Yorke, C.P.
16edb777-ac59-4a85-bfb3-a23f89de26e3
Coleman, G.N.
ea3639b9-c533-40d7-9edc-3c61246b06e0
Yorke, C.P.
16edb777-ac59-4a85-bfb3-a23f89de26e3
Coleman, G.N.
ea3639b9-c533-40d7-9edc-3c61246b06e0

Yorke, C.P. and Coleman, G.N. (2004) Assessment of common turbulence models for an idealised adverse pressure gradient flow. European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids, 23 (2), 319-337. (doi:10.1016/j.euromechflu.2003.07.002).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Results from direct numerical simulation (DNS) of Re?=390 channel flow subjected to the strain and deceleration typical of adverse pressure gradients (APGs), to the point of skin-friction reversal, are the reference for comparing four simple turbulence models. The statistics satisfy a one-dimensional unsteady problem and contain many of the physical complications associated with APGs, thus allowing a straightforward but nontrivial assessment of the models for APG flows, with rigorously defined boundary and initial conditions and an acceptable Reynolds number. We find the model accuracy varies significantly, with the Spalart–Allmaras and Menter SST schemes giving the best overall agreement with DNS. The other two models tested (Baldwin–Lomax and Launder–Sharma) deviate from the DNS, in terms of skin friction, much the same way they do in actual spatially developing APG boundary layers. This supports the relevance of the strained-channel idealisation. The DNS results are used to examine fundamental assumptions of the four models, casting light on the relative strengths and weaknesses of each.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2004

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 22688
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/22688
ISSN: 0997-7546
PURE UUID: d5e37479-2d41-4cfd-88e2-ea60938791b0

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Mar 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:39

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: C.P. Yorke
Author: G.N. Coleman

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×