The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A new bleeding model of the human acetabulum and a pilot comparison of 2 different cement pressurizers

A new bleeding model of the human acetabulum and a pilot comparison of 2 different cement pressurizers
A new bleeding model of the human acetabulum and a pilot comparison of 2 different cement pressurizers
In this cadaver study, we compared 2 different acetabular cement pressurizers (Exeter and Bernoski type) in paired human acetabula with simulated intraosseous bleeding. Pressure transducers were used to record intra-acetabular pressures during pressurization. Anteroposterior radiographs of the entire specimens were taken. Subsequently, standardized 3-mm-thick sections were cut through the acetabula, which were then microradiographed to evaluate cement penetration. Adequate pressurization was obtained with either pressurizer. The peak and sustained pressures obtained with the Exeter pressurizer (peak, 80 kPa; sustained, 38 kPa) tended to be higher than the pressures obtained with the Bernoski pressurizer (73 kPa; 24 kPa; P > 0.05). Accordingly, a tendency toward improved cement penetration into cancellous bone was found using the Exeter pressurizer (P > .05).
total hip arthroplasty, cement, acetabulum, pressurization, pressurizer
0883-5403
381-386
Parsch, Dominic
118892cf-9a9b-46d6-8f77-d10c18e779d7
Diehm, Caroline
4670198b-76cd-4f58-9739-0009a9e59b3a
New, Andrew M.R.
d2fbaf80-3abd-4bc5-ae36-9c77dfdde0d6
Schneider, Sven
ac4f9067-8e44-4ef0-bdc3-0a2d4b4684b8
Breusch, Steffen J.
c2241736-35ea-4052-aea2-1774486f41d3
Parsch, Dominic
118892cf-9a9b-46d6-8f77-d10c18e779d7
Diehm, Caroline
4670198b-76cd-4f58-9739-0009a9e59b3a
New, Andrew M.R.
d2fbaf80-3abd-4bc5-ae36-9c77dfdde0d6
Schneider, Sven
ac4f9067-8e44-4ef0-bdc3-0a2d4b4684b8
Breusch, Steffen J.
c2241736-35ea-4052-aea2-1774486f41d3

Parsch, Dominic, Diehm, Caroline, New, Andrew M.R., Schneider, Sven and Breusch, Steffen J. (2004) A new bleeding model of the human acetabulum and a pilot comparison of 2 different cement pressurizers. Journal of Arthroplasty, 19 (3), 381-386. (doi:10.1016/j.arth.2003.09.014).

Record type: Article

Abstract

In this cadaver study, we compared 2 different acetabular cement pressurizers (Exeter and Bernoski type) in paired human acetabula with simulated intraosseous bleeding. Pressure transducers were used to record intra-acetabular pressures during pressurization. Anteroposterior radiographs of the entire specimens were taken. Subsequently, standardized 3-mm-thick sections were cut through the acetabula, which were then microradiographed to evaluate cement penetration. Adequate pressurization was obtained with either pressurizer. The peak and sustained pressures obtained with the Exeter pressurizer (peak, 80 kPa; sustained, 38 kPa) tended to be higher than the pressures obtained with the Bernoski pressurizer (73 kPa; 24 kPa; P > 0.05). Accordingly, a tendency toward improved cement penetration into cancellous bone was found using the Exeter pressurizer (P > .05).

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2004
Keywords: total hip arthroplasty, cement, acetabulum, pressurization, pressurizer

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 22745
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/22745
ISSN: 0883-5403
PURE UUID: 908527b2-495f-4314-868e-c957b5cc4d04

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Mar 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:40

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Dominic Parsch
Author: Caroline Diehm
Author: Andrew M.R. New
Author: Sven Schneider
Author: Steffen J. Breusch

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×