The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Acetabular cementing technique in THA--flanged versus unflanged cups, cadaver experiments

Acetabular cementing technique in THA--flanged versus unflanged cups, cadaver experiments
Acetabular cementing technique in THA--flanged versus unflanged cups, cadaver experiments
Background There are few studies on the effect of acetabular cup design on cement penetration. Material and methods We evaluated the effects of an acetabular flange on cement pressurization and cement penetration in 12 cadavers. Flanged or unflanged cups were implanted in paired human acetabula with simulated intraosseous bleeding pressure but without cement pressurization before insertion of the cup. Three pressure transducers were used to record intra-acetabular peak and average pressures during cup insertion. Following implantation, the whole specimens were AP-radiographed and standardized sections through the acetabula were microradiographed to evaluate cement penetration. Results Flanged cups produced greater intra-acetabular peak pressures than unflanged cups, but did not increase the average intra-acetabular pressure. Cement penetration did not differ significantly between the two groups. Interpretation Our findings do not support the use of flanged cups as the sole means of cement pressurization in the acetabulum.
0001-6470
269-275
Parsch, Dominik
14d3e406-f390-4bd6-a15f-76e15e408d44
Diehm, Caroline
4670198b-76cd-4f58-9739-0009a9e59b3a
Schneider, Sven
ac4f9067-8e44-4ef0-bdc3-0a2d4b4684b8
New, Andrew
d2fbaf80-3abd-4bc5-ae36-9c77dfdde0d6
Breusch, Steffen
a40a8904-b301-4e19-96b4-1d6faebc1ebd
Parsch, Dominik
14d3e406-f390-4bd6-a15f-76e15e408d44
Diehm, Caroline
4670198b-76cd-4f58-9739-0009a9e59b3a
Schneider, Sven
ac4f9067-8e44-4ef0-bdc3-0a2d4b4684b8
New, Andrew
d2fbaf80-3abd-4bc5-ae36-9c77dfdde0d6
Breusch, Steffen
a40a8904-b301-4e19-96b4-1d6faebc1ebd

Parsch, Dominik, Diehm, Caroline, Schneider, Sven, New, Andrew and Breusch, Steffen (2004) Acetabular cementing technique in THA--flanged versus unflanged cups, cadaver experiments. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 75 (4), 269-275. (doi:10.1080/00016470410001196).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background There are few studies on the effect of acetabular cup design on cement penetration. Material and methods We evaluated the effects of an acetabular flange on cement pressurization and cement penetration in 12 cadavers. Flanged or unflanged cups were implanted in paired human acetabula with simulated intraosseous bleeding pressure but without cement pressurization before insertion of the cup. Three pressure transducers were used to record intra-acetabular peak and average pressures during cup insertion. Following implantation, the whole specimens were AP-radiographed and standardized sections through the acetabula were microradiographed to evaluate cement penetration. Results Flanged cups produced greater intra-acetabular peak pressures than unflanged cups, but did not increase the average intra-acetabular pressure. Cement penetration did not differ significantly between the two groups. Interpretation Our findings do not support the use of flanged cups as the sole means of cement pressurization in the acetabulum.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2004

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 22945
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/22945
ISSN: 0001-6470
PURE UUID: 9821e4d4-2978-434d-a60b-7942a1e1adac

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 23 Mar 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:42

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Dominik Parsch
Author: Caroline Diehm
Author: Sven Schneider
Author: Andrew New
Author: Steffen Breusch

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×