The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Nanoindentation of neat and in situ polymers in polymer-matrix composites

Nanoindentation of neat and in situ polymers in polymer-matrix composites
Nanoindentation of neat and in situ polymers in polymer-matrix composites
Nanoindentation experiments were performed on neat and in situ polymers in two different composite materials (IM7/977-3 and AS4/APC-2) and an adhesive (FM 300). The objective was to determine whether differences in modulus and hardness result from composite manufacturing procedures. Since the aim was to measure material properties, acceptable comparisons with neat properties could only be made using unconstrained, cured in situ tests. Measurements of modulus and hardness were made using two different techniques on two different indenters at a range of loads and penetration depths. The load–penetration depth data from the neat and in situ tests were compared to determine whether the fiber constraint affected the in situ tests and quantitative measures were implemented to determine whether an in situ test was unconstrained and therefore acceptable. The results of this comparison between neat and acceptable in situ tests showed a clear increase in modulus and hardness for the cured in situ materials, indicating that the materials are modified in some fashion by the manufacturing process. A finite element analysis of the in situ indentation experiment was performed to determine the required size for a polymer pocket that would minimize the constraint of the fibers on the polymer deformation response.
polymer–matrix composites, mechanical properties, deformation, hardness testing
0266-3538
595-607
Gregory, Jeremy R.
0b57613e-851a-4882-b99a-77339a10c70f
Spearing, S.M.
9e56a7b3-e0e8-47b1-a6b4-db676ed3c17a
Gregory, Jeremy R.
0b57613e-851a-4882-b99a-77339a10c70f
Spearing, S.M.
9e56a7b3-e0e8-47b1-a6b4-db676ed3c17a

Gregory, Jeremy R. and Spearing, S.M. (2005) Nanoindentation of neat and in situ polymers in polymer-matrix composites. Composites Science and Technology, 65 (3-4), 595-607. (doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.09.001).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Nanoindentation experiments were performed on neat and in situ polymers in two different composite materials (IM7/977-3 and AS4/APC-2) and an adhesive (FM 300). The objective was to determine whether differences in modulus and hardness result from composite manufacturing procedures. Since the aim was to measure material properties, acceptable comparisons with neat properties could only be made using unconstrained, cured in situ tests. Measurements of modulus and hardness were made using two different techniques on two different indenters at a range of loads and penetration depths. The load–penetration depth data from the neat and in situ tests were compared to determine whether the fiber constraint affected the in situ tests and quantitative measures were implemented to determine whether an in situ test was unconstrained and therefore acceptable. The results of this comparison between neat and acceptable in situ tests showed a clear increase in modulus and hardness for the cured in situ materials, indicating that the materials are modified in some fashion by the manufacturing process. A finite element analysis of the in situ indentation experiment was performed to determine the required size for a polymer pocket that would minimize the constraint of the fibers on the polymer deformation response.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2005
Additional Information: JNC13-AMAC-Strasbourg
Keywords: polymer–matrix composites, mechanical properties, deformation, hardness testing

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 23007
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/23007
ISSN: 0266-3538
PURE UUID: 5d7e5698-34de-4a6c-a048-5f027b85cf95
ORCID for S.M. Spearing: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3059-2014

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Mar 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:37

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Jeremy R. Gregory
Author: S.M. Spearing ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×