The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Accuracy and reproducibility of absolute nannoplankton abundances using the filtration technique in combination with a rotary sample splitter

Herrle, J.O. and Bollmann, J. (2004) Accuracy and reproducibility of absolute nannoplankton abundances using the filtration technique in combination with a rotary sample splitter Marine Micropaleontology, 53, (3-4), pp. 389-404. (doi:10.1016/j.marmicro.2004.08.002).

Record type: Article


The filtration technique is a widely applied method to calculate absolute coccolith abundances in paleoceanographic, paleoclimatic and ecological studies. Here, we have tested the accuracy and reproducibility of absolute coccolith abundance estimates obtained with the filtration method in combination with a rotary sample divider. The examination of two different filtration devices, a funnel and an in-line system, analysing a known number of microbeads per weight, revealed that counts obtained with funnel systems are up to Ø 18.6% too high. Repeated analyses (15×) of a fine-fraction sediment sample revealed a standard deviation of ±11.4% for the in-line system and ±15.2% for the funnel system, respectively. The comparison between three sub-samples (three splits of 1/30) showed a standard deviation of 4.6% for the in-line system and 9.9% for the funnel system, respectively. Therefore, we assume that the potential split error for the rotary splitter is ?4.6%.
The comparison of our results with estimates for the same samples analysed with the random settling and the “spiking with microbeads and spraying method” (SMS method) reveal that only the data obtained with the SMS and in-line filter method are statistically equal. The results obtained with the settling method are too low, whilst the results obtained with funnel filtration are too high in terms of coccolith absolute abundances. Our results confirm that the filtration method, including sample splitting with a rotary splitter, is a suitable method for the analysis of absolute coccolith abundances. However, the use of different filtration devices appears to affect the accuracy and reproducibility of the results. Furthermore, the number of splitting steps should be as small as possible to avoid an increase of error due to error propagation. In order to increase the reliability of the filtration method, we suggest calibrating a filtration device with microbeads as a standard measure. The reported reproducibility of the various preparation techniques may help to compare data sets obtained with different methods.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 2004
Keywords: coccoliths, foraminifera, particle flux, absolute abundance, microbeads, preparation technique, filtration technique


Local EPrints ID: 24077
ISSN: 0377-8398
PURE UUID: cc45fe28-4fc8-48cc-a2d1-a5a8a723ede5

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Mar 2006
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 16:15

Export record



Author: J.O. Herrle
Author: J. Bollmann

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.