The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository
Warning ePrints Soton is experiencing an issue with some file downloads not being available. We are working hard to fix this. Please bear with us.

Attitudes towards traditional acupuncture in the UK

Attitudes towards traditional acupuncture in the UK
Attitudes towards traditional acupuncture in the UK
Introduction: The practice and philosophy of traditional (classical) acupuncture (TA), as opposed to Western acupuncture, remains a contentious issue within mainstream healthcare in the UK. In spite of the relative integration of acupuncture within orthodox medical practice, a lack of paradigm conformity continues to divide traditional from Western approaches. This study sought to explore the perceptions and attitudes of existing acupuncture clinicians in the UK, from a range of professional backgrounds and affiliations, towards traditional acupuncture philosophy and practice. In doing so, it attempted to determine the extent to which traditional approaches were both regarded as legitimate and utilised in practice within mainstream healthcare.
Method: A postal questionnaire was deployed that incorporated an ‘attitudes to TA’ scale developed from a validated ‘attitude to alternative medicine’ scale. The questionnaire was distributed to 250 randomly selected subjects, drawn from the membership of three key professional acupuncture associations: 100 from the membership of the British Medical Acupuncture Society (BMAS), 100 from the British Acupuncture Council (BAcC) and 50 from the Acupuncture Association of Chartered Physiotherapists (AACP).
Results: A response rate of 60.8% (n = 152) was obtained. Respondents held a broadly positive attitude towards TA (65 ± 12; 95% CI 62.9, 67.1), which included 39 BMAS respondents (54 ± 11; 95% CI 50.5, 57.5), 36 AACP respondents (63 ± 7; 95% CI 60.7, 65.3) and 53 BAcC respondents (75 ± 5; 95% CI 73.7, 76.3). No difference was found in attitude between 27 general practitioners and 13 hospital doctors (p > 0.1). More positive attitudes towards TA were found among younger BMAS respondents (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient [rs] = -0.353; 0.01 < p < 0.05). Of BAcC respondents, 62% used ‘trigger point’ theory, whereas 59% and 72% of respondents in the BMAS and AACP groups respectively used ‘channels’ theory.
Conclusions: These findings confirm broadly positive attitudes towards TA within each of the professional groups from which data were drawn, although they do reveal a range of disparate attitudes to TA among the groups, particularly between the BMAS and BAcC members.
acupuncture
1176-2330
37-45
Shao, John Y.J.
44ba0dd9-70c6-47bc-b5ea-84702f721807
Borthwick, Alan M.
b4d1fa51-182d-4296-b5fe-5b7c32ef6f9d
Lewith, George T.
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Hopwood, Val
1cd3d7f0-247b-4f30-b61d-9a0d65f35519
Shao, John Y.J.
44ba0dd9-70c6-47bc-b5ea-84702f721807
Borthwick, Alan M.
b4d1fa51-182d-4296-b5fe-5b7c32ef6f9d
Lewith, George T.
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Hopwood, Val
1cd3d7f0-247b-4f30-b61d-9a0d65f35519

Shao, John Y.J., Borthwick, Alan M., Lewith, George T. and Hopwood, Val (2005) Attitudes towards traditional acupuncture in the UK. Evidence-Based Integrative Medicine, 2 (1), 37-45.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Introduction: The practice and philosophy of traditional (classical) acupuncture (TA), as opposed to Western acupuncture, remains a contentious issue within mainstream healthcare in the UK. In spite of the relative integration of acupuncture within orthodox medical practice, a lack of paradigm conformity continues to divide traditional from Western approaches. This study sought to explore the perceptions and attitudes of existing acupuncture clinicians in the UK, from a range of professional backgrounds and affiliations, towards traditional acupuncture philosophy and practice. In doing so, it attempted to determine the extent to which traditional approaches were both regarded as legitimate and utilised in practice within mainstream healthcare.
Method: A postal questionnaire was deployed that incorporated an ‘attitudes to TA’ scale developed from a validated ‘attitude to alternative medicine’ scale. The questionnaire was distributed to 250 randomly selected subjects, drawn from the membership of three key professional acupuncture associations: 100 from the membership of the British Medical Acupuncture Society (BMAS), 100 from the British Acupuncture Council (BAcC) and 50 from the Acupuncture Association of Chartered Physiotherapists (AACP).
Results: A response rate of 60.8% (n = 152) was obtained. Respondents held a broadly positive attitude towards TA (65 ± 12; 95% CI 62.9, 67.1), which included 39 BMAS respondents (54 ± 11; 95% CI 50.5, 57.5), 36 AACP respondents (63 ± 7; 95% CI 60.7, 65.3) and 53 BAcC respondents (75 ± 5; 95% CI 73.7, 76.3). No difference was found in attitude between 27 general practitioners and 13 hospital doctors (p > 0.1). More positive attitudes towards TA were found among younger BMAS respondents (Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient [rs] = -0.353; 0.01 < p < 0.05). Of BAcC respondents, 62% used ‘trigger point’ theory, whereas 59% and 72% of respondents in the BMAS and AACP groups respectively used ‘channels’ theory.
Conclusions: These findings confirm broadly positive attitudes towards TA within each of the professional groups from which data were drawn, although they do reveal a range of disparate attitudes to TA among the groups, particularly between the BMAS and BAcC members.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2005
Keywords: acupuncture

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 24279
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/24279
ISSN: 1176-2330
PURE UUID: b97fbf7b-3947-4156-af87-c78b599214d8

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Mar 2006
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 15:49

Export record

Contributors

Author: John Y.J. Shao
Author: Alan M. Borthwick
Author: George T. Lewith
Author: Val Hopwood

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×