The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Home-based versus hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction or revascularisation: design and rationale of the Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation Study (BRUM): a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN72884263]

Jolly, Kate, Lip, Gregory Y.H., Sandercock, Josie, Greenfield, Sheila M., Raftery, James P., Mant, Jonathan, Taylor, Rod, Lane, Deirdre, Lee, Kaeng Wai and Stevens, A.J. (2003) Home-based versus hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation after myocardial infarction or revascularisation: design and rationale of the Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation Study (BRUM): a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN72884263] BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 3, (10) (doi:10.1186/1471-2261-3-10).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background
Cardiac rehabilitation following myocardial infarction reduces subsequent mortality, but uptake and adherence to rehabilitation programmes remains poor, particularly among women, the elderly and ethnic minority groups. Evidence of the effectiveness of home-based cardiac rehabilitation remains limited. This trial evaluates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home-based compared to hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation.
Methods/design
A pragmatic randomised controlled trial of home-based compared with hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation in four hospitals serving a multi-ethnic inner city population in the United Kingdom was designed. The home programme is nurse-facilitated, manual-based using the Heart Manual. The hospital programmes offer comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation in an out-patient setting.
Patients
We will randomise 650 adult, English or Punjabi-speaking patients of low-medium risk following myocardial infarction, coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass graft who have been referred for cardiac rehabilitation.
Main outcome measures
Serum cholesterol, smoking cessation, blood pressure, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Score, distance walked on Shuttle walk-test measured at 6, 12 and 24 months. Adherence to the programmes will be estimated using patient self-reports of activity.
In-depth interviews with non-attendees and non-adherers will ascertain patient views and the acceptability of the programmes and provide insights about non-attendance and aims to generate a theory of attendance at cardiac rehabilitation. The economic analysis will measure National Health Service costs using resource inputs. Patient costs will be established from the qualitative research, in particular how they affect adherence.
Discussion
More data are needed on the role of home-based versus hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation for patients following myocardial infarction and revascularisation, which would be provided by the Birmingham Rehabilitation Uptake Maximisation Study (BRUM) study and has implications for the clinical management of these patients. A novel feature of this study is the inclusion of non-English Punjabi speakers.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 2003
Keywords: cardiac rehabilitation, randomised controlled trial, home care services, coronary disease, economic evaluation

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 24351
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/24351
ISSN: 1471-2261
PURE UUID: 974a7239-0255-4047-a01f-1b5735aa85f3

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Mar 2006
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 16:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Kate Jolly
Author: Gregory Y.H. Lip
Author: Josie Sandercock
Author: Sheila M. Greenfield
Author: James P. Raftery
Author: Jonathan Mant
Author: Rod Taylor
Author: Deirdre Lane
Author: Kaeng Wai Lee
Author: A.J. Stevens

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×