The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Effectiveness of appropriately trained nurses in preoperative assessment: randomised controlled equivalence/non-inferiority trial

Kinley, Helen, Czoski-Murray, Carolyn, George, Steve, McCabe, Chris, Primrose, John, Reilly, Charles, Wood, Richard, Nicolson, Paula, Healy, Caroline, Read, Susan, Norman, John, Janke, Ellen, Alhameed, Hameed, Fernandes, Nick and Thomas, Eileen OpCheck Study Group (2002) Effectiveness of appropriately trained nurses in preoperative assessment: randomised controlled equivalence/non-inferiority trial BMJ, 325, (7376), pp. 1323-1326. (doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7376.1323).

Record type: Article


Objective: To determine whether preoperative assessments carried out by appropriately trained nurses are inferior in quality to those carried out by preregistration house officers.

Design: Randomised controlled equivalence/non-inferiority trial.

Setting: Four NHS hospitals in three trusts. Three of the four were teaching hospitals.

Participants: all patients attending for assessment before general anaesthesia for general, vascular, urological, or breast surgery between April 1998 and March 1999.
Intervention: Assessment by one of three appropriately trained nurses or by one of several preregistration house officers.

Main outcome measures: History taken, physical examination, and investigations ordered. Measures evaluated by a specialist registrar in anaesthetics and placed in four categories: correct, overassessment, underassessment not affecting management, and underassessment possibly affecting management (primary outcome).

Results: 1907 patients were randomised, and 1874 completed the study; 926 were assessed by house officers and 948 by nurses. Overall 121/948 (13%) assessments carried out by nurses were judged to have possibly affected management compared with 138/926 (15%) of those performed by house officers. Nurses were judged to be non-inferior to house officers in assessment, although there was variation among them in terms of the quality of history taking. The house officers ordered considerably more unnecessary tests than the nurses (218/926 (24%) v 129/948 (14%).

Conclusions: there is no reason to inhibit the development of nurse led preoperative assessment provided that the nurses involved receive adequate training. However, house officers will continue to require experience in preoperative assessment.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 7 December 2002
Keywords: surgery,'t, hospital, teaching, medical staff, multicenter studies, standards, nursing evaluation research, comparative study, research support, physical examination, design, nurses, medical history taking, hospitals, public, history, clinical-trial, patients, outcome assessment (health care), humans, clinical competence, preoperative care, referral and consultation, nursing audit, quality of health care, nursing staff, nursing, england


Local EPrints ID: 24365
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: a24433b7-51ef-4249-9597-659767573bc6
ORCID for John Primrose: ORCID iD

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Mar 2006
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 16:13

Export record



Author: Helen Kinley
Author: Carolyn Czoski-Murray
Author: Steve George
Author: Chris McCabe
Author: John Primrose ORCID iD
Author: Charles Reilly
Author: Richard Wood
Author: Paula Nicolson
Author: Caroline Healy
Author: Susan Read
Author: John Norman
Author: Ellen Janke
Author: Hameed Alhameed
Author: Nick Fernandes
Author: Eileen Thomas

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.