The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Should we give detailed advice and information booklets to patients with back pain? A randomized controlled factorial trial of a self-management booklet and doctor advice to take exercise for back pain

Little, Paul, Roberts, Lisa, Blowers, Helen, Garwood, Judit, Cantrell, Ted, Langridge, John and Chapman, Judith (2001) Should we give detailed advice and information booklets to patients with back pain? A randomized controlled factorial trial of a self-management booklet and doctor advice to take exercise for back pain Spine, 26, (19), pp. 2065-2072. (doi:10.1097/00007632-200110010-00003).

Record type: Article


Study Design: Randomized controlled factorial trial.
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of a booklet and of physician advice to take regular exercise.
Summary of Background Data: Educational booklets are one of the simplest interventions for back pain but have not been shown to alter pain and function. Although there is evidence that advice to mobilize is effective, doctors have also been advised to encourage regular exercise-but there is no evidence that such advice alone improves outcomes.
Method: Eight doctors from six practices randomized 311 patients with a new episode of back pain using sealed numbered opaque envelopes to receive a detailed self-management booklet, advice to take regular exercise, both, or neither. All groups were advised to mobilize and to use simple analgesia. Patients were telephoned during the first week after entry into the study, and after 3 weeks to assess a validated numerical pain/function score (0 = no pain normal activities to 100 = extreme pain no normal activities). Patients also returned a postal questionnaire in the first week with the Aberdeen pain and function scale, a knowledge score, and a reliable satisfaction scale (mean score of 4 items: 0 = not satisfied to 100 = extremely satisfied).
Results: Pain/function scores were obtained in 239 (77%) patients. There were interactions between exercise and booklet groups for both pain/function scores and the Aberdeen scale, which are unlikely to have been chance findings (P = 0.009 and P = 0.012, respectively). In comparison with the control group, there were reductions in the pain/function score in the first week with a booklet (-8.7, 95% CI -17.4 to -0.03) or advice to exercise (-7.9; -16.7 to 0.8) but much less effect with both together (-0.08, -9.0 to 8.9). Similarly, the Aberdeen scale was lower in the booklet group (-3.8, -7.7 to 0.07) and in the exercise advice group (-5.3; -9.3 to -1.38) but much less with both combined (-1.9, -5.8 to 2.1). There was no significant difference between groups in pain/function scores by week 3, when 58% reported being back to normal. Satisfaction was increased in booklet (7.9, 1.3 to 14.4) and exercise groups (7.4, 0.8 to 13.9)), and a booklet also increased knowledge (Kruskal-Wallis [chi]2 27.2, P = 0.001).
Conclusion: Doctors can increase satisfaction and moderately improve functional outcomes in the period immediately after the consultation when back pain is worst, by using very simple interventions: either by endorsing a self-management booklet or by giving advice to take exercise. Previous studies suggest that simple advice and the same written information provide reinforcement. This study supports evidence that it may not be helpful to provide a detailed information booklet and advice together, where the amounts or formats of information differ.

PDF 00007632-200110010-00003.pdf - Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (186kB)

More information

Published date: 1 October 2001


Local EPrints ID: 24388
ISSN: 0362-2436
PURE UUID: 517ab1e2-9a6f-4b64-b3f4-bb3f1778aed5

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Mar 2006
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 16:13

Export record



Author: Paul Little
Author: Lisa Roberts
Author: Helen Blowers
Author: Judit Garwood
Author: Ted Cantrell
Author: John Langridge
Author: Judith Chapman

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.