The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Comparison of agreement between different measures of blood pressure in primary care and daytime ambulatory blood pressure

Little, Paul, Barnett, Jane, Barnsley, Lucy, Marjoram, Jean, Fitzgerald-Barron, Alex and Mant, David (2002) Comparison of agreement between different measures of blood pressure in primary care and daytime ambulatory blood pressure BMJ, 325, (7358), pp. 254-257. (doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7358.254).

Record type: Article


Objective: to assess alternatives to measuring ambulatory pressure, which best predicts response to treatment and adverse outcome.

Setting: three general practices in England.

Design: validation study.

Participants: patients with newly diagnosed high or borderline high blood pressure; patients receiving treatment for hypertension but with poor control.

Main outcome measures: overall agreement with ambulatory pressure; prediction of high ambulatory pressure (>135/85 mm Hg) and treatment thresholds.

Results: readings made by doctors were much higher than ambulatory systolic pressure (difference 18.9 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval 16.1 to 21.7), as were recent readings made in the clinic outside research settings (19.9 mm Hg,17.6 to 22.1). This applied equally to treated patients with poor control (doctor v ambulatory 21.4 mm Hg, 17.3 to 25.4). Doctors' and recent clinic readings ranked systolic pressure poorly compared with ambulatory pressure and other measurements (doctor r=0.46; clinic 0.47; repeated readings by nurse 0.60; repeated self measurement 0.73; home readings 0.75) and were not specific at predicting high blood pressure (doctor 26%; recent clinic 15%; nurse 72%; patient in surgery 81%; home 60%), with poor likelihood ratios for a positive test (doctor 1.2; clinic 1.1; nurse 2.1, patient in surgery 4.7; home 2.2). Nor were doctor or recent clinic measures specific in predicting treatment thresholds.

Conclusion: the "white coat" effect is important in diagnosing and assessing control of hypertension in primary care and is not a research artefact. If ambulatory or home measurements are not available, repeated measurements by the nurse or patient should result in considerably less unnecessary monitoring, initiation, or changing of treatment. It is time to stop using high blood pressure readings documented by general practitioners to make treatment decisions.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 3 August 2002


Local EPrints ID: 24399
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: 0dfe5400-5ece-4872-b27e-b151b0653d3d

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 31 Mar 2006
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 16:13

Export record



Author: Paul Little
Author: Jane Barnett
Author: Lucy Barnsley
Author: Jean Marjoram
Author: Alex Fitzgerald-Barron
Author: David Mant

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton:

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.