The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Prevalence and occupational associations of neck pain in the British population

Prevalence and occupational associations of neck pain in the British population
Prevalence and occupational associations of neck pain in the British population
Objectives: This study determined the prevalence of neck pain and its relation to occupation and occupational activities in the general population.
Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to 21 201 subjects aged 16-64 years, randomly selected from the patient registers of general practices in England, Scotland, and Wales, and to 993 subjects randomly selected from pay records of the armed services. Information was collected on occupation, workplace physical activities, neck pain in the past week and year, headaches, and feelings of tiredness or stress. Associations were explored by logistic regression, the resultant odds ratios being converted to prevalence ratios (PR).
Results: Among 12 907 respondents, 4348 and 2528 reported neck pain in past year (1421 with pain interfering with normal activities) and week, respectively. Symptoms were the most prevalent among male construction workers [past week and year 24% and 38% (pain interfering with activities 11%), respectively], followed by nurses, armed services members, and the unemployed. Generally the age-standardized prevalence of neck pain varied little by occupation. Work with arms above the shoulders for >1 hours/day was associated with a significant excess of symptoms [PR 1.3-1.7 (women) and 1.2-1.4 (men)], but no associations existed for typing, lifting, vibratory tool use, or professional driving. Stronger neck-pain associations were found with frequent headaches (PR 2.3-2.8) and frequent tiredness or stress (PR 2.2-2.5) than with occupational activities.
Conclusions: The data provide evidence against a strong association between neck pain and the examined occupational physical activities. They suggest that psychosocial factors may be more important.
causes, community, neck pain, occupational neck pain, prevalence, work-related neck pain
49-56
Palmer, K.T.
0cfe63f0-1d33-40ff-ae8c-6c33601df850
Walker-Bone, K.
ad7d1336-ed2c-4f39-ade5-da84eb412109
Griffin, M.J.
24112494-9774-40cb-91b7-5b4afe3c41b8
Syddall, H.
f2b26145-6176-4fbd-bb08-f8d5ede1d2fe
Pannett, B.
1799085b-0c63-4d72-903c-edea48bacb9f
Coggon, D.
2b43ce0a-cc61-4d86-b15d-794208ffa5d3
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Palmer, K.T.
0cfe63f0-1d33-40ff-ae8c-6c33601df850
Walker-Bone, K.
ad7d1336-ed2c-4f39-ade5-da84eb412109
Griffin, M.J.
24112494-9774-40cb-91b7-5b4afe3c41b8
Syddall, H.
f2b26145-6176-4fbd-bb08-f8d5ede1d2fe
Pannett, B.
1799085b-0c63-4d72-903c-edea48bacb9f
Coggon, D.
2b43ce0a-cc61-4d86-b15d-794208ffa5d3
Cooper, C.
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6

Palmer, K.T., Walker-Bone, K., Griffin, M.J., Syddall, H., Pannett, B., Coggon, D. and Cooper, C. (2001) Prevalence and occupational associations of neck pain in the British population. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 27 (1), 49-56.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objectives: This study determined the prevalence of neck pain and its relation to occupation and occupational activities in the general population.
Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to 21 201 subjects aged 16-64 years, randomly selected from the patient registers of general practices in England, Scotland, and Wales, and to 993 subjects randomly selected from pay records of the armed services. Information was collected on occupation, workplace physical activities, neck pain in the past week and year, headaches, and feelings of tiredness or stress. Associations were explored by logistic regression, the resultant odds ratios being converted to prevalence ratios (PR).
Results: Among 12 907 respondents, 4348 and 2528 reported neck pain in past year (1421 with pain interfering with normal activities) and week, respectively. Symptoms were the most prevalent among male construction workers [past week and year 24% and 38% (pain interfering with activities 11%), respectively], followed by nurses, armed services members, and the unemployed. Generally the age-standardized prevalence of neck pain varied little by occupation. Work with arms above the shoulders for >1 hours/day was associated with a significant excess of symptoms [PR 1.3-1.7 (women) and 1.2-1.4 (men)], but no associations existed for typing, lifting, vibratory tool use, or professional driving. Stronger neck-pain associations were found with frequent headaches (PR 2.3-2.8) and frequent tiredness or stress (PR 2.2-2.5) than with occupational activities.
Conclusions: The data provide evidence against a strong association between neck pain and the examined occupational physical activities. They suggest that psychosocial factors may be more important.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2001
Keywords: causes, community, neck pain, occupational neck pain, prevalence, work-related neck pain

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 24439
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/24439
PURE UUID: 1f9197cd-c123-4e29-a8af-038b3c6574b3
ORCID for K. Walker-Bone: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-5992-1459
ORCID for M.J. Griffin: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-0743-9502
ORCID for D. Coggon: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1930-3987
ORCID for C. Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Mar 2006
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:51

Export record

Contributors

Author: K.T. Palmer
Author: K. Walker-Bone ORCID iD
Author: M.J. Griffin ORCID iD
Author: H. Syddall
Author: B. Pannett
Author: D. Coggon ORCID iD
Author: C. Cooper ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×