Appraisal standards in occupational medicine
Appraisal standards in occupational medicine
Following a series of serious misdemeanours by British doctors, the General Medical Council (GMC) has introduced a system of re-licensing called ‘revalidation’. Annual medical appraisal forms an important cornerstone of the proposed system, but specific guidance is lacking on the content of appraisal for occupational physicians, and the kinds of evidence that they might bring to critical reviews of performance. Two educational bodies, the Revalidation Committee of the Faculty of Occupational Medicine, Royal College of Physicians and the Education Panel of the Society of Occupational Medicine, have jointly developed a set of recommendations on appraisal to further the process. In this paper we summarize the background and present the guidelines promulgated by the Faculty and the Society
appraisal, governance, professional standards, revalidation
218-226
Palmer, Keith T.
0cfe63f0-1d33-40ff-ae8c-6c33601df850
McElearney, Noel
2b0f62da-922a-40cf-8da7-c74789aae087
Harrington, Malcolm
dd0ddb8d-ba43-4b8d-af14-4f718d3b8466
2004
Palmer, Keith T.
0cfe63f0-1d33-40ff-ae8c-6c33601df850
McElearney, Noel
2b0f62da-922a-40cf-8da7-c74789aae087
Harrington, Malcolm
dd0ddb8d-ba43-4b8d-af14-4f718d3b8466
Palmer, Keith T., McElearney, Noel and Harrington, Malcolm
(2004)
Appraisal standards in occupational medicine.
Occupational Medicine, 54 (4), .
Abstract
Following a series of serious misdemeanours by British doctors, the General Medical Council (GMC) has introduced a system of re-licensing called ‘revalidation’. Annual medical appraisal forms an important cornerstone of the proposed system, but specific guidance is lacking on the content of appraisal for occupational physicians, and the kinds of evidence that they might bring to critical reviews of performance. Two educational bodies, the Revalidation Committee of the Faculty of Occupational Medicine, Royal College of Physicians and the Education Panel of the Society of Occupational Medicine, have jointly developed a set of recommendations on appraisal to further the process. In this paper we summarize the background and present the guidelines promulgated by the Faculty and the Society
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2004
Keywords:
appraisal, governance, professional standards, revalidation
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 24448
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/24448
ISSN: 0962-7480
PURE UUID: 26cb634a-e712-40f0-8d77-56aa628a31b2
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 30 Mar 2006
Last modified: 08 Jan 2022 09:53
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Keith T. Palmer
Author:
Noel McElearney
Author:
Malcolm Harrington
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics