Manual handling risk controls in hospitals (MARCH): a cross-sectional survey of UK hospitals
Manual handling risk controls in hospitals (MARCH): a cross-sectional survey of UK hospitals
Injury and ill health among healthcare staff associated with handling patients is an important area of risk for UK National Health Service (NHS) employers. Since the introduction of a specific legal duty to control this risk in 1992, many Trusts have developed manual handling risk management strategies. Anecdotally, however, practice varies between Trusts and there is no published description of common practice among NHS employers. The latter would be useful as a benchmark for risk managers. Therefore, we undertook a cross-sectional survey of 158 UK trusts (81% of those invited) using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire to collect information about manual handling risk controls. Most Trusts had basic systems for risk management, including defined management accountability, written policies, provision of handling equipment, training, expert advice about manual handling and access to occupational health services and physiotherapy for injured employees. However, there was wide variation in important aspects, including the extent of expert manpower and criteria for referral to occupational health. Arrangements for monitoring risk controls were generally poor, and the variation in practice was a cause for concern. These data will help NHS employers by providing a benchmark against which to measure and develop risk management systems for manual handling. Future research should aim to develop standards through consensus opinion and ultimately evidence of effectiveness of risk controls.
121-131
Smedley, J.
93ab0e57-e127-4367-a8b6-4814177e1f39
Poole, J.
d6c5377d-ac31-4552-8108-e5bd16f9fd00
Waclawski, E.
9b21578e-3c56-445f-a8e7-dbe5b47acc0f
Harrison, J.
848aa9dc-797f-40f8-b63d-bca0d90f7b55
Stevens, A.
ee290275-c6b9-473b-a798-8cc38ee51cb5
Buckle, P.
2622f3e1-c381-4001-a35f-7fbd55cc30e9
Coggon, D.
2b43ce0a-cc61-4d86-b15d-794208ffa5d3
2004
Smedley, J.
93ab0e57-e127-4367-a8b6-4814177e1f39
Poole, J.
d6c5377d-ac31-4552-8108-e5bd16f9fd00
Waclawski, E.
9b21578e-3c56-445f-a8e7-dbe5b47acc0f
Harrison, J.
848aa9dc-797f-40f8-b63d-bca0d90f7b55
Stevens, A.
ee290275-c6b9-473b-a798-8cc38ee51cb5
Buckle, P.
2622f3e1-c381-4001-a35f-7fbd55cc30e9
Coggon, D.
2b43ce0a-cc61-4d86-b15d-794208ffa5d3
Smedley, J., Poole, J., Waclawski, E., Harrison, J., Stevens, A., Buckle, P. and Coggon, D.
(2004)
Manual handling risk controls in hospitals (MARCH): a cross-sectional survey of UK hospitals.
Health Services Management Research, 17 (2), .
(doi:10.1258/095148404323043145).
Abstract
Injury and ill health among healthcare staff associated with handling patients is an important area of risk for UK National Health Service (NHS) employers. Since the introduction of a specific legal duty to control this risk in 1992, many Trusts have developed manual handling risk management strategies. Anecdotally, however, practice varies between Trusts and there is no published description of common practice among NHS employers. The latter would be useful as a benchmark for risk managers. Therefore, we undertook a cross-sectional survey of 158 UK trusts (81% of those invited) using a structured interviewer-administered questionnaire to collect information about manual handling risk controls. Most Trusts had basic systems for risk management, including defined management accountability, written policies, provision of handling equipment, training, expert advice about manual handling and access to occupational health services and physiotherapy for injured employees. However, there was wide variation in important aspects, including the extent of expert manpower and criteria for referral to occupational health. Arrangements for monitoring risk controls were generally poor, and the variation in practice was a cause for concern. These data will help NHS employers by providing a benchmark against which to measure and develop risk management systems for manual handling. Future research should aim to develop standards through consensus opinion and ultimately evidence of effectiveness of risk controls.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2004
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 24510
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/24510
PURE UUID: 42500b62-28e7-4b4a-a010-ca2a46146913
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 31 Mar 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:53
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
J. Smedley
Author:
J. Poole
Author:
E. Waclawski
Author:
J. Harrison
Author:
A. Stevens
Author:
P. Buckle
Author:
D. Coggon
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics