The association between diet and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in subjects selected from general practice
The association between diet and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in subjects selected from general practice
 
  It is unclear why some smokers develop chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) whilst the majority do not. Antioxidants found in food may protect against lung tissue injury, but previous epidemiological studies are inconsistent and do not focus on those most at risk of COPD, namely smokers. This case-controlled study measured the difference in dietary intake between smokers and ex-smokers with and without COPD. 
Cases were patients >45 yrs of age with >10 pack-yrs of smoking, a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) of ≤70% and a FEV1 of ≤80% of predicted. Controls were patients >45 yrs of age with >10 pack-yrs of smoking, a FEV1/FVC of >70% and a FEV1 >80% pred. Data were collected using validated questionnaires. Logistic regression analysis for an unmatched case-controlled study was performed. 
After controlling for other independent predictors of COPD, those with vegetable intake of ≥1 portion·day–1 (93 g) were less likely to have COPD, as were those consuming ≥1.5 portions·day–1 of fruit. This was not due to an overall reduction in food/calorie intake caused by the disease because: 1) adjusting for body mass index did not alter the estimates; 2) the effect was specific to fruit and vegetables, i.e. not other food groups; and 3) the estimates from incident cases were similar. 
In conclusion, fruit and vegetable consumption is inversely associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and may explain why some smokers do not develop chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
  
  313-318
  
    
      Watson, L.
      
        b19c88c5-88f3-44fe-935e-1cece1d079a2
      
     
  
    
      Margetts, B.
      
        d415f4a1-d572-4ebc-be25-f54886cb4788
      
     
  
    
      Howarth, P.
      
        ff19c8c4-86b0-4a88-8f76-b3d87f142a21
      
     
  
    
      Dorward, M.
      
        ede98eab-1027-4a21-a38c-3bccb7c71e06
      
     
  
    
      Thompson, R.
      
        1a394a6d-b006-4aec-b9be-b3e6c16fdb7b
      
     
  
    
      Little, P.
      
        1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
      
     
  
  
   
  
  
    
      August 2002
    
    
  
  
    
      Watson, L.
      
        b19c88c5-88f3-44fe-935e-1cece1d079a2
      
     
  
    
      Margetts, B.
      
        d415f4a1-d572-4ebc-be25-f54886cb4788
      
     
  
    
      Howarth, P.
      
        ff19c8c4-86b0-4a88-8f76-b3d87f142a21
      
     
  
    
      Dorward, M.
      
        ede98eab-1027-4a21-a38c-3bccb7c71e06
      
     
  
    
      Thompson, R.
      
        1a394a6d-b006-4aec-b9be-b3e6c16fdb7b
      
     
  
    
      Little, P.
      
        1bf2d1f7-200c-47a5-ab16-fe5a8756a777
      
     
  
       
    
 
  
    
      
  
  
  
  
  
  
    Watson, L., Margetts, B., Howarth, P., Dorward, M., Thompson, R. and Little, P.
  
  
  
  
   
    (2002)
  
  
    
    The association between diet and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in subjects selected from general practice.
  
  
  
  
    European Respiratory Journal, 20 (2), .
  
   
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
    
    
      
        
          Abstract
          It is unclear why some smokers develop chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) whilst the majority do not. Antioxidants found in food may protect against lung tissue injury, but previous epidemiological studies are inconsistent and do not focus on those most at risk of COPD, namely smokers. This case-controlled study measured the difference in dietary intake between smokers and ex-smokers with and without COPD. 
Cases were patients >45 yrs of age with >10 pack-yrs of smoking, a forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) of ≤70% and a FEV1 of ≤80% of predicted. Controls were patients >45 yrs of age with >10 pack-yrs of smoking, a FEV1/FVC of >70% and a FEV1 >80% pred. Data were collected using validated questionnaires. Logistic regression analysis for an unmatched case-controlled study was performed. 
After controlling for other independent predictors of COPD, those with vegetable intake of ≥1 portion·day–1 (93 g) were less likely to have COPD, as were those consuming ≥1.5 portions·day–1 of fruit. This was not due to an overall reduction in food/calorie intake caused by the disease because: 1) adjusting for body mass index did not alter the estimates; 2) the effect was specific to fruit and vegetables, i.e. not other food groups; and 3) the estimates from incident cases were similar. 
In conclusion, fruit and vegetable consumption is inversely associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and may explain why some smokers do not develop chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
         
      
      
        
          
            
  
    Text
 313.pdf
     - Version of Record
   
  
    
      Restricted to Repository staff only
    
  
  
 
          
            
              Request a copy
            
           
            
           
        
        
       
    
   
  
  
  More information
  
    
      Published date: August 2002
 
    
  
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
     
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
  
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
  
        Identifiers
        Local EPrints ID: 24550
        URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/24550
        
        
        
          ISSN: 0903-1936
        
        
          PURE UUID: 7c5c35c0-3947-45ba-a980-f0a986e7863f
        
  
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
            
          
        
    
        
          
            
          
        
    
        
          
            
          
        
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
            
              
            
          
        
    
  
  Catalogue record
  Date deposited: 31 Mar 2006
  Last modified: 12 Jul 2024 01:34
  Export record
  
  
 
 
  
    
    
      Contributors
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              L. Watson
            
          
        
      
        
      
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
              
              
                M. Dorward
              
              
            
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              R. Thompson
            
          
        
      
        
      
      
      
    
  
   
  
    Download statistics
    
      Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
      
      View more statistics