The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

The placebo needle, is it a valid and convincing placebo for use in acupuncture trials? A randomised, single-blind, cross-over pilot trial

The placebo needle, is it a valid and convincing placebo for use in acupuncture trials? A randomised, single-blind, cross-over pilot trial
The placebo needle, is it a valid and convincing placebo for use in acupuncture trials? A randomised, single-blind, cross-over pilot trial
The issue of what constitutes an effective and realistic acupuncture placebo control has been a continuing problem for acupuncture research. In order to provide an effective placebo, the control procedure must be convincing, visible and should mimic, in all respects, apart from a physiological effect, the real active treatment. The ‘Streitberger’ needle might fulfil these criteria and this paper reports on a validation study. This was a single-blind, randomised, cross-over pilot study. Patients were drawn from the orthopaedic hip and knee, joint replacement waiting list. Intervention consisted of either 2 weeks of treatment with real acupuncture followed by 2 weeks on placebo, or vice versa. The prime outcome was a needle sensation questionnaire and there was a range of secondary outcomes. Thirty-seven patients were randomised and completed treatment. Groups were well balanced at baseline. No significant differences between groups or needle types were found for any of the sensations measured. Most patients were unable to discriminate between the needles by penetration; however, nearly 40% were able to detect a difference in treatment type between needles. No major differences in outcome between real and placebo needling could be found. The fact that nearly 40% of subjects did not find that the two interventions were similar, however, raises some concerns with regard to the wholesale adoption of this instrument as a standard acupuncture placebo. Further work on inter-tester reliability and standardisation of technique is highly recommended before we can be confident about using this needle in further studies.
acupuncture, placebo, placebo needle
0304-3959
401-409
White, Peter
f33829fd-24c9-4b44-a148-24eca9d52253
Lewith, George
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Hopwood, Val
1cd3d7f0-247b-4f30-b61d-9a0d65f35519
Prescott, Phil
cf0adfdd-989b-4f15-9e60-ef85eed817b2
White, Peter
f33829fd-24c9-4b44-a148-24eca9d52253
Lewith, George
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Hopwood, Val
1cd3d7f0-247b-4f30-b61d-9a0d65f35519
Prescott, Phil
cf0adfdd-989b-4f15-9e60-ef85eed817b2

White, Peter, Lewith, George, Hopwood, Val and Prescott, Phil (2003) The placebo needle, is it a valid and convincing placebo for use in acupuncture trials? A randomised, single-blind, cross-over pilot trial. Pain, 106 (3), 401-409. (doi:10.1016/j.pain.2003.08.013).

Record type: Article

Abstract

The issue of what constitutes an effective and realistic acupuncture placebo control has been a continuing problem for acupuncture research. In order to provide an effective placebo, the control procedure must be convincing, visible and should mimic, in all respects, apart from a physiological effect, the real active treatment. The ‘Streitberger’ needle might fulfil these criteria and this paper reports on a validation study. This was a single-blind, randomised, cross-over pilot study. Patients were drawn from the orthopaedic hip and knee, joint replacement waiting list. Intervention consisted of either 2 weeks of treatment with real acupuncture followed by 2 weeks on placebo, or vice versa. The prime outcome was a needle sensation questionnaire and there was a range of secondary outcomes. Thirty-seven patients were randomised and completed treatment. Groups were well balanced at baseline. No significant differences between groups or needle types were found for any of the sensations measured. Most patients were unable to discriminate between the needles by penetration; however, nearly 40% were able to detect a difference in treatment type between needles. No major differences in outcome between real and placebo needling could be found. The fact that nearly 40% of subjects did not find that the two interventions were similar, however, raises some concerns with regard to the wholesale adoption of this instrument as a standard acupuncture placebo. Further work on inter-tester reliability and standardisation of technique is highly recommended before we can be confident about using this needle in further studies.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 1 December 2003
Keywords: acupuncture, placebo, placebo needle
Organisations: Statistics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 24554
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/24554
ISSN: 0304-3959
PURE UUID: c591b09e-2d8a-418e-98f0-a3a2d452910c

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 30 Mar 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:56

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Peter White
Author: George Lewith
Author: Val Hopwood
Author: Phil Prescott

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×