The core outcomes for neck pain: validation of a new outcome measure
The core outcomes for neck pain: validation of a new outcome measure
Study Design: Patients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial were asked to complete various questionnaires, which were then compared to establish validity for a new neck pain questionnaire.
Objectives: To validate a new and brief outcome measure for use with patients with mechanical neck pain.
Summary of Background Data: Neck pain is a very common problem and one that clinicians will be required to treat with some regularity. In today's climate of evidence-based practice and the need to quantify and justify clinical intervention, a quick and easy method to evaluate progress is required. Such a measure has already been produced for those experiencing back pain, but as yet, there is no such measure for neck pain and this needs to be addressed.
Methods: The back pain measure was adapted to enable its use with patients with neck pain. Repeatability was assessed by using a 1-week test/retest on 104 patients who were enrolled in a neck pain trial. Validity was assessed by comparing the new questionnaire against other already well validated measures (i.e., the Neck Disability Index and a Visual Analogue Scale for pain) with 133 patients.
Results: The test/retest showed excellent repeatability with high intraclass correlations and P < 0.001 for each question tested. The Core Neck Pain Questionnaire also showed good validity, giving close agreement to the other comparison measures.
Conclusion: The short Core Neck Pain Questionnaire has been demonstrated to be repeatable and valid as a brief outcome measure for use with patients with mechanical neck pain.
1923-1930
White, Peter
f33829fd-24c9-4b44-a148-24eca9d52253
Lewith, George
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Prescott, Phil
cf0adfdd-989b-4f15-9e60-ef85eed817b2
1 September 2004
White, Peter
f33829fd-24c9-4b44-a148-24eca9d52253
Lewith, George
0fc483fa-f17b-47c5-94d9-5c15e65a7625
Prescott, Phil
cf0adfdd-989b-4f15-9e60-ef85eed817b2
Abstract
Study Design: Patients enrolled in a randomized controlled trial were asked to complete various questionnaires, which were then compared to establish validity for a new neck pain questionnaire.
Objectives: To validate a new and brief outcome measure for use with patients with mechanical neck pain.
Summary of Background Data: Neck pain is a very common problem and one that clinicians will be required to treat with some regularity. In today's climate of evidence-based practice and the need to quantify and justify clinical intervention, a quick and easy method to evaluate progress is required. Such a measure has already been produced for those experiencing back pain, but as yet, there is no such measure for neck pain and this needs to be addressed.
Methods: The back pain measure was adapted to enable its use with patients with neck pain. Repeatability was assessed by using a 1-week test/retest on 104 patients who were enrolled in a neck pain trial. Validity was assessed by comparing the new questionnaire against other already well validated measures (i.e., the Neck Disability Index and a Visual Analogue Scale for pain) with 133 patients.
Results: The test/retest showed excellent repeatability with high intraclass correlations and P < 0.001 for each question tested. The Core Neck Pain Questionnaire also showed good validity, giving close agreement to the other comparison measures.
Conclusion: The short Core Neck Pain Questionnaire has been demonstrated to be repeatable and valid as a brief outcome measure for use with patients with mechanical neck pain.
Text
24556.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: 1 September 2004
Organisations:
Statistics
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 24556
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/24556
ISSN: 0362-2436
PURE UUID: 74e12562-095b-4530-b29d-76dada649712
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 31 Mar 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:56
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Peter White
Author:
George Lewith
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics