The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Congenital anomaly surveillance in England-ascertainment deficiencies in the national system

Boyd, P.A., Armstrong, B., Dolk, H., Botting, B., Pattenden, S., Abramsky, L., Rankin, J., Vrijheid, M. and Wellesley, D. (2005) Congenital anomaly surveillance in England-ascertainment deficiencies in the national system BMJ, 330, (7481), pp. 1-5. (doi:10.1136/bmj.38300.665301.3A).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Objective Firstly, to assess the completeness of ascertainment in the National Congenital Anomaly System (NCAS), the basis for congenital anomaly surveillance in England and Wales, and its variation by defect, geographical area, and socioeconomic deprivation. Secondly, to assess the impact of the lack of data on pregnancies terminated because of fetal anomaly.
Design Comparison of the NCAS with four local congenital anomaly registers in England.
Setting Four regions in England covering some 109 000 annual births.
Participants Cases of congenital anomalies registered in the NCAS (live births and stillbirths) and independently registered in the four local registers (live births, stillbirths, fetal losses from 20 weeks' gestation, and pregnancies terminated after prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomaly).
Main outcome measure The ratio of cases identified by the national register to those in local registry files, calculated for different specified anomalies, for whole registry areas, and for hospital catchment areas within registry boundaries.
Results Ascertainment by the NCAS (compared with data from local registers, from which terminations of pregnancy were removed) was 40% (34% for chromosomal anomalies and 42% for non-chromosomal anomalies) and varied markedly by defect, by local register, and by hospital catchment area, but not by area deprivation. When terminations of pregnancy were included in the register data, ascertainment by NCAS was 27% (19% for chromosomal anomalies and 31% for non-chromosomal anomalies), and the geographical variation was of a similar magnitude.
Conclusion The surveillance of congenital anomalies in England is currently inadequate because ascertainment to the national register is low and non-uniform and because no data exist on termination of pregnancy resulting from prenatal diagnosis of fetal anomaly.

Full text not available from this repository.

More information

Published date: 2005
Additional Information: Information in Practice

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 24635
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/24635
ISSN: 0959-8138
PURE UUID: be3a17d7-c5ce-4fe4-9390-56833b50168e

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Apr 2006
Last modified: 17 Jul 2017 16:13

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: P.A. Boyd
Author: B. Armstrong
Author: H. Dolk
Author: B. Botting
Author: S. Pattenden
Author: L. Abramsky
Author: J. Rankin
Author: M. Vrijheid
Author: D. Wellesley

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×