The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Prevalence of congenital anomalies in five British regions, 1991-99

Prevalence of congenital anomalies in five British regions, 1991-99
Prevalence of congenital anomalies in five British regions, 1991-99
Aims: To describe trends in total and live birth prevalence, regional differences in prevalence, and outcome of pregnancy of selected congenital anomalies.
Methods: Population based registry study of 839 521 births to mothers resident in five geographical areas of Britain during 1991–99. Main outcome measures were: total and live birth prevalence; pregnancy outcome; proportion of stillbirths due to congenital anomalies; and secular trends.
Results: The sample consisted of 10 844 congenital anomalies, giving a total prevalence of 129 per 10 000 registered births (95% CI 127 to 132). Live birth prevalence was 82.2 per 10 000 births (95% CI 80.3 to 84.2) and declined significantly with time. The proportion of all stillbirths with a congenital anomaly was 10.5% (453 stillbirths). The proportion of pregnancies resulting in a termination increased from 27% (289 cases) in 1991 to 34.7% (384 cases) in 1999, whereas the proportion of live births declined from 68.2% (730 cases) to 58.5% (648 cases). Although similar rates of congenital anomaly groups were notified to the registers, variation in rates by register was present. There was a secular decline in the total prevalence of non-chromosomal and an increase in chromosomal anomalies.
Conclusions: Regional variation exists in the prevalence of specific congenital anomalies. For some anomalies this can be partially explained by ascertainment variation. For others (neural tube defects, diaphragmatic hernia, gastroschisis), higher prevalence rates in the northern regions (Glasgow and Northern) were true differences. Live birth prevalence declined over the study due to an increase in terminations of pregnancy.
ascertainment, congenital anomalies, prevalence, regional variation, stillbirth rate
1359-2998
F374-F379
Rankin, J.
f46fdd1f-6006-4a21-ace2-b4d8d8c85c20
Pattenden, S.
feeeba34-e977-4fb8-a0a5-3e3375c54280
Abramsky, L.
d152009f-196f-4c84-8ab5-dad358d4e2fb
Boyd, P.
509f4035-a6d0-40e0-9a48-12836a96fee3
Jordan, H.
9a71297c-7c09-47a3-81d2-d4065e1cb8e2
Stone, D.
3b483cae-2753-4f01-b6cd-96d7c8c7bb99
Vrijheid, M.
1a2d6bc3-548e-422c-a10c-72caa0f6732e
Wellesley, D.
17cbd6c1-0efb-4df1-ae05-64a44987c9c0
Dolk, H.
74d140fa-b30c-4e14-9ac5-0897504bfad7
Rankin, J.
f46fdd1f-6006-4a21-ace2-b4d8d8c85c20
Pattenden, S.
feeeba34-e977-4fb8-a0a5-3e3375c54280
Abramsky, L.
d152009f-196f-4c84-8ab5-dad358d4e2fb
Boyd, P.
509f4035-a6d0-40e0-9a48-12836a96fee3
Jordan, H.
9a71297c-7c09-47a3-81d2-d4065e1cb8e2
Stone, D.
3b483cae-2753-4f01-b6cd-96d7c8c7bb99
Vrijheid, M.
1a2d6bc3-548e-422c-a10c-72caa0f6732e
Wellesley, D.
17cbd6c1-0efb-4df1-ae05-64a44987c9c0
Dolk, H.
74d140fa-b30c-4e14-9ac5-0897504bfad7

Rankin, J., Pattenden, S., Abramsky, L., Boyd, P., Jordan, H., Stone, D., Vrijheid, M., Wellesley, D. and Dolk, H. (2005) Prevalence of congenital anomalies in five British regions, 1991-99. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 90 (5), F374-F379. (doi:10.1136/adc.2003.047902).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Aims: To describe trends in total and live birth prevalence, regional differences in prevalence, and outcome of pregnancy of selected congenital anomalies.
Methods: Population based registry study of 839 521 births to mothers resident in five geographical areas of Britain during 1991–99. Main outcome measures were: total and live birth prevalence; pregnancy outcome; proportion of stillbirths due to congenital anomalies; and secular trends.
Results: The sample consisted of 10 844 congenital anomalies, giving a total prevalence of 129 per 10 000 registered births (95% CI 127 to 132). Live birth prevalence was 82.2 per 10 000 births (95% CI 80.3 to 84.2) and declined significantly with time. The proportion of all stillbirths with a congenital anomaly was 10.5% (453 stillbirths). The proportion of pregnancies resulting in a termination increased from 27% (289 cases) in 1991 to 34.7% (384 cases) in 1999, whereas the proportion of live births declined from 68.2% (730 cases) to 58.5% (648 cases). Although similar rates of congenital anomaly groups were notified to the registers, variation in rates by register was present. There was a secular decline in the total prevalence of non-chromosomal and an increase in chromosomal anomalies.
Conclusions: Regional variation exists in the prevalence of specific congenital anomalies. For some anomalies this can be partially explained by ascertainment variation. For others (neural tube defects, diaphragmatic hernia, gastroschisis), higher prevalence rates in the northern regions (Glasgow and Northern) were true differences. Live birth prevalence declined over the study due to an increase in terminations of pregnancy.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: September 2005
Keywords: ascertainment, congenital anomalies, prevalence, regional variation, stillbirth rate
Organisations: Human Genetics

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 24908
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/24908
ISSN: 1359-2998
PURE UUID: 103cca62-7154-4976-a6d7-f23c5ba91e37

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 03 Apr 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 06:59

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: J. Rankin
Author: S. Pattenden
Author: L. Abramsky
Author: P. Boyd
Author: H. Jordan
Author: D. Stone
Author: M. Vrijheid
Author: D. Wellesley
Author: H. Dolk

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×