A label based neuro-controller

Lawrence, A.J. (1995) A label based neuro-controller University of Southampton, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Doctoral Thesis .


Full text not available from this repository.


Many controller tuners are based on linear models of both the controller and process. Desired performance is often predetermined or adjusted in a manner which is not directly related to the desired response. All physical processes contain nonlinearities, commonly of the actuator saturating type, and many controllers contain heuristics for implementation in real systems, such as anti-integral wind up in PID controllers. For different processes a range of closed loop response shapes are desired, often described by features of the response such as rise time, overshoot and settling time. This thesis investigates the possibility of basing controller tuning on closed loop system response data such that desired performance is incorporated directly in terms of familiar time domain features or labels thus eliminating the need for a mathematical process model and repeated tuning reformulations to achieve the desired performance. A controller tuning method named Label Based Neuro-Control is developed and analysed by application to PID controller tuning for a number of process models indicative of real process behaviour. The Method of Inequalities is employed as a comparative controller tuning technique and observations are made concerning its performance. Simulations and numerical investigation indicate that LBNC is a viable technique for the tuning of low order controllers for SISO processes. Tuning is straightforward, flexible and copes well with process parametric changes and performance specification reformulation. The drawbacks are a complicated pretune phase, a limited selection of suitable labels and a difficulty in defining general classes of tuning problems for its application. The method of inequalities is shown to be a powerful technique applicable to higher order controllers and provides a natural incorporation of system constraints. However, operator supervision is necessary for successful tuning. Neither technique is based on the assumption of process linearity but due to the inability to characterise classes of input signals and operating points the types of process nonlinearity are restricted. The controller may be nonlinear, but must be predetermined, and an input/output process model of arbitrary structure is required.

Item Type: Thesis (Doctoral)
Organisations: University of Southampton, Southampton Wireless Group
ePrint ID: 250156
Date :
Date Event
Date Deposited: 04 May 1999
Last Modified: 18 Apr 2017 00:24
Further Information:Google Scholar
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/250156

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item