Enteral nutritional support and use of diabetes-specific formulas for patients with diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Enteral nutritional support and use of diabetes-specific formulas for patients with diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE—The aim of this systematic review was to determine the benefits of nutritional support in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Studies utilizing an enteral nutritional support intervention (oral supplements or tube feeding) were identified using electronic databases and bibliography searches. Comparisons of interest were nutritional support versus routine care and standard versus diabetes-specific formulas (containing high proportions of monounsaturated fatty acids, fructose, and fiber). Outcomes of interest were measures of glycemia and lipid status, medication requirements, nutritional status, quality of life, complications, and mortality. Meta-analyses were performed where possible.
RESULTS—A total of 23 studies (comprising 784 patients) of oral supplements (16 studies) and tube feeding (7 studies) were included in the review, and the majority compared diabetes-specific with standard formulas. Compared with standard formulas, diabetes-specific formulas significantly reduced postprandial rise in blood glucose (by 1.03 mmol/l [95% CI 0.58–1.47]; six randomized controlled trials [RCTs]), peak blood glucose concentration (by 1.59 mmol/l [86–2.32]; two RCTs), and glucose area under curve (by 7.96 mmol · l–1 · min–1 [2.25–13.66]; four RCTs, i.e., by 35%) with no significant effect on HDL, total cholesterol, or triglyceride concentrations. In addition, individual studies reported a reduced requirement for insulin (26–71% lower) and fewer complications with diabetes-specific compared with standard nutritional formulas.
CONCLUSIONS—This systematic review shows that short- and long-term use of diabetes-specific formulas as oral supplements and tube feeds are associated with improved glycemic control compared with standard formulas. If such nutritional support is given long term, this may have implications for reducing chronic complications of diabetes, such as cardiovascular events.
2267-2279
Elia, Marinos
964bf436-e623-46d6-bc3f-5dd04c9ef4c1
Ceriello, Antonio
bc758779-acf0-4634-b729-f2f302b7c2ef
Laube, Heiner
de9b819b-75aa-4e23-b411-2a17fb2df2bc
Sinclair, Alan J.
075b0c83-c816-498b-a11e-4b9de56194ed
Engfer, Meike
4f691076-d149-4c30-8068-88825cee6fa2
Stratton, Rebecca J.
c6a5ead1-3387-42e7-8bea-5ac7d969d87b
September 2005
Elia, Marinos
964bf436-e623-46d6-bc3f-5dd04c9ef4c1
Ceriello, Antonio
bc758779-acf0-4634-b729-f2f302b7c2ef
Laube, Heiner
de9b819b-75aa-4e23-b411-2a17fb2df2bc
Sinclair, Alan J.
075b0c83-c816-498b-a11e-4b9de56194ed
Engfer, Meike
4f691076-d149-4c30-8068-88825cee6fa2
Stratton, Rebecca J.
c6a5ead1-3387-42e7-8bea-5ac7d969d87b
Elia, Marinos, Ceriello, Antonio, Laube, Heiner, Sinclair, Alan J., Engfer, Meike and Stratton, Rebecca J.
(2005)
Enteral nutritional support and use of diabetes-specific formulas for patients with diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Diabetes Care, 28 (9), .
(doi:10.2337/diacare.28.9.2267).
(PMID:16123506)
Abstract
OBJECTIVE—The aim of this systematic review was to determine the benefits of nutritional support in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Studies utilizing an enteral nutritional support intervention (oral supplements or tube feeding) were identified using electronic databases and bibliography searches. Comparisons of interest were nutritional support versus routine care and standard versus diabetes-specific formulas (containing high proportions of monounsaturated fatty acids, fructose, and fiber). Outcomes of interest were measures of glycemia and lipid status, medication requirements, nutritional status, quality of life, complications, and mortality. Meta-analyses were performed where possible.
RESULTS—A total of 23 studies (comprising 784 patients) of oral supplements (16 studies) and tube feeding (7 studies) were included in the review, and the majority compared diabetes-specific with standard formulas. Compared with standard formulas, diabetes-specific formulas significantly reduced postprandial rise in blood glucose (by 1.03 mmol/l [95% CI 0.58–1.47]; six randomized controlled trials [RCTs]), peak blood glucose concentration (by 1.59 mmol/l [86–2.32]; two RCTs), and glucose area under curve (by 7.96 mmol · l–1 · min–1 [2.25–13.66]; four RCTs, i.e., by 35%) with no significant effect on HDL, total cholesterol, or triglyceride concentrations. In addition, individual studies reported a reduced requirement for insulin (26–71% lower) and fewer complications with diabetes-specific compared with standard nutritional formulas.
CONCLUSIONS—This systematic review shows that short- and long-term use of diabetes-specific formulas as oral supplements and tube feeds are associated with improved glycemic control compared with standard formulas. If such nutritional support is given long term, this may have implications for reducing chronic complications of diabetes, such as cardiovascular events.
Text
2267.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Published date: September 2005
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 25454
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/25454
ISSN: 1935-5548
PURE UUID: e56ec132-6d61-4199-a90c-9a57efe21872
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 11 Apr 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:02
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Antonio Ceriello
Author:
Heiner Laube
Author:
Alan J. Sinclair
Author:
Meike Engfer
Author:
Rebecca J. Stratton
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics