Identifying Communities of Practice through Ontology Network Analysis
Identifying Communities of Practice through Ontology Network Analysis
Communities of practice—groups of individuals interested in a particular job, procedure, or work domain—informally swap insights on work-related tasks, often through quick chats by the water cooler. They act as corporate memories, transfer best practice, provide mechanisms for situated learning, and act as foci for innovation.1,2 Increasingly, organizations are harnessing communities of practice to carry out important knowledge management functions.3 However, a significant first step is identifying the community, which often doesn’t designate itself as such, and its members, who don’t know they belong! So, this step involves determining which people in a community of practice have common interests in particular practices or functions and producing sets or clusters of related individuals. Community identification traditionally demands heavy resources and often includes extensive interviewing. In this article, we describe Ontocopi (Ontology-Based Community of Practice Identifier), a tool to help identify communities. Ontocopi lets you infer the informal relations that define a community of practice from the presence of more formal relations. For instance, if A and B have no formal relation but they have both authored papers with C (formal relation), they might share interests (informal relation). Because Ontocopi works in this way, we cannot claim without qualification that it identifies communities of practice. Significant informal relations might have little or no connection to the formal ones. Here, we refer to the networks uncovered by Ontocopi as COPs and to informal social networks as communities of practice. We work under the assumption that COPs are sometimes decent proxies for communities of practice.
18-25
Alani, Harith
70cdbdce-1494-44c2-9dae-65d82bf7e991
Dasmahapatra, Srinandan
eb5fd76f-4335-4ae9-a88a-20b9e2b3f698
O'Hara, Kieron
0a64a4b1-efb5-45d1-a4c2-77783f18f0c4
Shadbolt, Nigel
5c5acdf4-ad42-49b6-81fe-e9db58c2caf7
March 2003
Alani, Harith
70cdbdce-1494-44c2-9dae-65d82bf7e991
Dasmahapatra, Srinandan
eb5fd76f-4335-4ae9-a88a-20b9e2b3f698
O'Hara, Kieron
0a64a4b1-efb5-45d1-a4c2-77783f18f0c4
Shadbolt, Nigel
5c5acdf4-ad42-49b6-81fe-e9db58c2caf7
Alani, Harith, Dasmahapatra, Srinandan, O'Hara, Kieron and Shadbolt, Nigel
(2003)
Identifying Communities of Practice through Ontology Network Analysis.
IEEE Intelligent Systems, 18 (2), .
Abstract
Communities of practice—groups of individuals interested in a particular job, procedure, or work domain—informally swap insights on work-related tasks, often through quick chats by the water cooler. They act as corporate memories, transfer best practice, provide mechanisms for situated learning, and act as foci for innovation.1,2 Increasingly, organizations are harnessing communities of practice to carry out important knowledge management functions.3 However, a significant first step is identifying the community, which often doesn’t designate itself as such, and its members, who don’t know they belong! So, this step involves determining which people in a community of practice have common interests in particular practices or functions and producing sets or clusters of related individuals. Community identification traditionally demands heavy resources and often includes extensive interviewing. In this article, we describe Ontocopi (Ontology-Based Community of Practice Identifier), a tool to help identify communities. Ontocopi lets you infer the informal relations that define a community of practice from the presence of more formal relations. For instance, if A and B have no formal relation but they have both authored papers with C (formal relation), they might share interests (informal relation). Because Ontocopi works in this way, we cannot claim without qualification that it identifies communities of practice. Significant informal relations might have little or no connection to the formal ones. Here, we refer to the networks uncovered by Ontocopi as COPs and to informal social networks as communities of practice. We work under the assumption that COPs are sometimes decent proxies for communities of practice.
Text
x2alani.lo.pdf
- Other
More information
Published date: March 2003
Organisations:
Web & Internet Science, Southampton Wireless Group
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 257397
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/257397
ISSN: 1541-1672
PURE UUID: 31171d9c-c839-4e0a-97ae-4aad323097a3
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Apr 2003
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:09
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Harith Alani
Author:
Srinandan Dasmahapatra
Author:
Nigel Shadbolt
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics