The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Monthly Oral Ibandronate Therapy in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: 1-year results from the MOBILE study

Monthly Oral Ibandronate Therapy in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: 1-year results from the MOBILE study
Monthly Oral Ibandronate Therapy in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: 1-year results from the MOBILE study
Once-monthly (50/50, 100, and 150 mg) and daily (2.5 mg; 3-year vertebral fracture risk reduction: 52%) oral ibandronate regimens were compared in 1609 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. At least equivalent efficacy and similar safety and tolerability were shown after 1 year.
Introduction: Suboptimal adherence to daily and weekly oral bisphosphonates can potentially compromise therapeutic outcomes in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Although yet to be prospectively shown in osteoporosis, evidence from randomized clinical trials in several other chronic conditions shows that reducing dosing frequency enhances therapeutic adherence. Ibandronate is a new and potent bisphosphonate with antifracture efficacy proven for daily administration and also intermittent administration with a dose-free interval of >2 months. This report presents comparative data on the efficacy and safety of monthly and daily oral ibandronate regimens.
Materials and Methods: MOBILE is a 2-year, randomized, double-blind, phase III, noninferiority trial. A total of 1609 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were assigned to one of four oral ibandronate regimens: 2.5 mg daily, 50 mg/50 mg monthly (single doses, consecutive days), 100 mg monthly, or 150 mg monthly.
Results: After 1 year, lumbar spine BMD increased by 3.9%, 4.3%, 4.1%, and 4.9% in the 2.5, 50 /50, 100, and 150 mg arms, respectively. All monthly regimens were proven noninferior, and the 150 mg regimen superior, to the daily regimen. All monthly regimens produced similar hip BMD gains, which were larger than those with the daily regimen. All regimens similarly decreased serum levels of C-telopeptide, a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Compared with the daily regimen, a significantly larger proportion of women receiving the 100 and 150 mg monthly regimens achieved predefined threshold levels for percent change from baseline in lumbar spine (6%) or total hip BMD (3%). All regimens were similarly well tolerated.
Conclusions: Monthly ibandronate is at least as effective and well tolerated as the currently approved daily ibandronate regimen in postmenopausal osteoporosis.
0884-0431
1315-1322
Miller, Paul D.
d08ce2e7-dc60-4511-b065-70da5b36158c
McClung, Michael R.
906c38b0-c914-4ff3-a31e-74bd6d895c54
Macovei, Liviu
d954ad7b-2a00-4d0b-8f73-473f695e56b7
Stakkestad, Jacob A.
cf04820f-6c2e-4a69-a45c-f881e3549d28
Luckey, Marjorie
d0b2caa4-c1e2-428d-90e9-0d2c311ace26
Bonvoisin, Bernard
c98da75a-04b0-477d-a0ac-6a1cb172209e
Reginster, Jean Yves
33684a35-87f7-4b8d-bb91-4da2b809f855
Recker, Robert R.
a62064aa-b8c2-4468-9c83-6916d0a7c381
Hughes, Claire
6283af10-6529-4ce8-8ed7-77af507f1012
Lewiecki, E. Michael
6ada4ad7-3093-460f-9ad4-bfce9ab0ec4c
Felsenberg, Dieter
c99572fa-a8a9-48da-8f90-5ba6253c9c83
Delmas, Pierre D.
788d83fc-6eb8-41ac-a72b-d0c7c304db1f
Kendler, David L.
690099b2-d237-483f-8fd3-1e421f5950cc
Bolognese, Michael A.
8484271f-f0b7-42b7-9cd5-7c9b43a3e2fe
Mairon, Nicole
13a0b00d-cb66-4cb4-b1a2-4ba5c600f033
Cooper, Cyrus
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6
Miller, Paul D.
d08ce2e7-dc60-4511-b065-70da5b36158c
McClung, Michael R.
906c38b0-c914-4ff3-a31e-74bd6d895c54
Macovei, Liviu
d954ad7b-2a00-4d0b-8f73-473f695e56b7
Stakkestad, Jacob A.
cf04820f-6c2e-4a69-a45c-f881e3549d28
Luckey, Marjorie
d0b2caa4-c1e2-428d-90e9-0d2c311ace26
Bonvoisin, Bernard
c98da75a-04b0-477d-a0ac-6a1cb172209e
Reginster, Jean Yves
33684a35-87f7-4b8d-bb91-4da2b809f855
Recker, Robert R.
a62064aa-b8c2-4468-9c83-6916d0a7c381
Hughes, Claire
6283af10-6529-4ce8-8ed7-77af507f1012
Lewiecki, E. Michael
6ada4ad7-3093-460f-9ad4-bfce9ab0ec4c
Felsenberg, Dieter
c99572fa-a8a9-48da-8f90-5ba6253c9c83
Delmas, Pierre D.
788d83fc-6eb8-41ac-a72b-d0c7c304db1f
Kendler, David L.
690099b2-d237-483f-8fd3-1e421f5950cc
Bolognese, Michael A.
8484271f-f0b7-42b7-9cd5-7c9b43a3e2fe
Mairon, Nicole
13a0b00d-cb66-4cb4-b1a2-4ba5c600f033
Cooper, Cyrus
e05f5612-b493-4273-9b71-9e0ce32bdad6

Miller, Paul D., McClung, Michael R., Macovei, Liviu, Stakkestad, Jacob A., Luckey, Marjorie, Bonvoisin, Bernard, Reginster, Jean Yves, Recker, Robert R., Hughes, Claire, Lewiecki, E. Michael, Felsenberg, Dieter, Delmas, Pierre D., Kendler, David L., Bolognese, Michael A., Mairon, Nicole and Cooper, Cyrus (2005) Monthly Oral Ibandronate Therapy in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis: 1-year results from the MOBILE study. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 20 (8), 1315-1322. (doi:10.1359/JBMR.050313).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Once-monthly (50/50, 100, and 150 mg) and daily (2.5 mg; 3-year vertebral fracture risk reduction: 52%) oral ibandronate regimens were compared in 1609 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. At least equivalent efficacy and similar safety and tolerability were shown after 1 year.
Introduction: Suboptimal adherence to daily and weekly oral bisphosphonates can potentially compromise therapeutic outcomes in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Although yet to be prospectively shown in osteoporosis, evidence from randomized clinical trials in several other chronic conditions shows that reducing dosing frequency enhances therapeutic adherence. Ibandronate is a new and potent bisphosphonate with antifracture efficacy proven for daily administration and also intermittent administration with a dose-free interval of >2 months. This report presents comparative data on the efficacy and safety of monthly and daily oral ibandronate regimens.
Materials and Methods: MOBILE is a 2-year, randomized, double-blind, phase III, noninferiority trial. A total of 1609 women with postmenopausal osteoporosis were assigned to one of four oral ibandronate regimens: 2.5 mg daily, 50 mg/50 mg monthly (single doses, consecutive days), 100 mg monthly, or 150 mg monthly.
Results: After 1 year, lumbar spine BMD increased by 3.9%, 4.3%, 4.1%, and 4.9% in the 2.5, 50 /50, 100, and 150 mg arms, respectively. All monthly regimens were proven noninferior, and the 150 mg regimen superior, to the daily regimen. All monthly regimens produced similar hip BMD gains, which were larger than those with the daily regimen. All regimens similarly decreased serum levels of C-telopeptide, a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Compared with the daily regimen, a significantly larger proportion of women receiving the 100 and 150 mg monthly regimens achieved predefined threshold levels for percent change from baseline in lumbar spine (6%) or total hip BMD (3%). All regimens were similarly well tolerated.
Conclusions: Monthly ibandronate is at least as effective and well tolerated as the currently approved daily ibandronate regimen in postmenopausal osteoporosis.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2005

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 25817
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/25817
ISSN: 0884-0431
PURE UUID: 66ec2d86-684b-4b44-b503-6a45e8afb8c9
ORCID for Cyrus Cooper: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-3510-0709

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Apr 2006
Last modified: 18 Mar 2024 02:44

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Paul D. Miller
Author: Michael R. McClung
Author: Liviu Macovei
Author: Jacob A. Stakkestad
Author: Marjorie Luckey
Author: Bernard Bonvoisin
Author: Jean Yves Reginster
Author: Robert R. Recker
Author: Claire Hughes
Author: E. Michael Lewiecki
Author: Dieter Felsenberg
Author: Pierre D. Delmas
Author: David L. Kendler
Author: Michael A. Bolognese
Author: Nicole Mairon
Author: Cyrus Cooper ORCID iD

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×