The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Enteral nutritional support in prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Enteral nutritional support in prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Enteral nutritional support in prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background: There have been few systematic reviews and no meta-analyses of the clinical benefits of nutritional support in patients with, or at risk of developing, pressure ulcers. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to address the impact of enteral nutritional support on pressure ulcer incidence and healing and a range of other clinically relevant outcome measures in this group.
Methods: Fifteen studies (including eight randomised controlled trials (RCTs)) of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) or enteral tube feeding (ETF), identified using electronic databases (including Pub Med and Cochrane) and bibliography searches, were included in the systematic review. Outcomes including pressure ulcer incidence, pressure ulcer healing, quality of life, complications, mortality, anthropometry and dietary intake were recorded, with the aim of comparing nutritional support versus routine care (e.g. usual diet and pressure ulcer care) and nutritional formulas of different composition. Of these 15 studies, 5 RCTs comparing ONS (4 RCTs) and ETF (1 RCT) with routine care could be included in a meta-analysis of pressure ulcer incidence.
Results: Meta-analysis showed that ONS (250–500 kcal, 2–26 weeks) were associated with a significantly lower incidence of pressure ulcer development in at-risk patients compared to routine care (odds ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.62–0.89, 4 RCTs, n = 1224, elderly, post-surgical, chronically hospitalised patients). Similar results were obtained when a combined meta-analysis of ONS (4 RCT) and ETF (1 RCT) trials was performed (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62–0.88, 5 RCTs, n = 1325). Individual studies showed a trend towards improved healing of existing pressure ulcers with disease-specific (including high protein) versus standard formulas, although robust RCTs are required to confirm this. Although some studies indicate that total nutritional intake is improved, data on other outcome measures (quality of life) are lacking.
Conclusions: This systematic review shows enteral nutritional support, particularly high protein ONS, can significantly reduce the risk of developing pressure ulcers (by 25%). Although studies suggest ONS and ETF may improve healing of PU, further research to confirm this trend is required.
meta-analysis, supplement, enteral, formula, pressure sores, decubitus, wound healing, prevention, nutrition
1568-1637
422-450
Stratton, Rebecca J.
c6a5ead1-3387-42e7-8bea-5ac7d969d87b
Ek, Anna-Christina
61239319-9ab5-475e-b1d3-a8b185cffa03
Engfer, Meike
4f691076-d149-4c30-8068-88825cee6fa2
Moore, Zena
be24f9db-758c-43bf-8d69-8ecbe7bd38f3
Rigby, Paul
c1326f49-15f5-486f-b1e9-993e62e6ee41
Wolfe, Robert
5e092a07-47fd-4049-9009-2a0e3f88684f
Elia, Marinos
964bf436-e623-46d6-bc3f-5dd04c9ef4c1
Stratton, Rebecca J.
c6a5ead1-3387-42e7-8bea-5ac7d969d87b
Ek, Anna-Christina
61239319-9ab5-475e-b1d3-a8b185cffa03
Engfer, Meike
4f691076-d149-4c30-8068-88825cee6fa2
Moore, Zena
be24f9db-758c-43bf-8d69-8ecbe7bd38f3
Rigby, Paul
c1326f49-15f5-486f-b1e9-993e62e6ee41
Wolfe, Robert
5e092a07-47fd-4049-9009-2a0e3f88684f
Elia, Marinos
964bf436-e623-46d6-bc3f-5dd04c9ef4c1

Stratton, Rebecca J., Ek, Anna-Christina, Engfer, Meike, Moore, Zena, Rigby, Paul, Wolfe, Robert and Elia, Marinos (2005) Enteral nutritional support in prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Research Reviews, 4 (3), 422-450. (doi:10.1016/j.arr.2005.03.005).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: There have been few systematic reviews and no meta-analyses of the clinical benefits of nutritional support in patients with, or at risk of developing, pressure ulcers. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to address the impact of enteral nutritional support on pressure ulcer incidence and healing and a range of other clinically relevant outcome measures in this group.
Methods: Fifteen studies (including eight randomised controlled trials (RCTs)) of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) or enteral tube feeding (ETF), identified using electronic databases (including Pub Med and Cochrane) and bibliography searches, were included in the systematic review. Outcomes including pressure ulcer incidence, pressure ulcer healing, quality of life, complications, mortality, anthropometry and dietary intake were recorded, with the aim of comparing nutritional support versus routine care (e.g. usual diet and pressure ulcer care) and nutritional formulas of different composition. Of these 15 studies, 5 RCTs comparing ONS (4 RCTs) and ETF (1 RCT) with routine care could be included in a meta-analysis of pressure ulcer incidence.
Results: Meta-analysis showed that ONS (250–500 kcal, 2–26 weeks) were associated with a significantly lower incidence of pressure ulcer development in at-risk patients compared to routine care (odds ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.62–0.89, 4 RCTs, n = 1224, elderly, post-surgical, chronically hospitalised patients). Similar results were obtained when a combined meta-analysis of ONS (4 RCT) and ETF (1 RCT) trials was performed (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.62–0.88, 5 RCTs, n = 1325). Individual studies showed a trend towards improved healing of existing pressure ulcers with disease-specific (including high protein) versus standard formulas, although robust RCTs are required to confirm this. Although some studies indicate that total nutritional intake is improved, data on other outcome measures (quality of life) are lacking.
Conclusions: This systematic review shows enteral nutritional support, particularly high protein ONS, can significantly reduce the risk of developing pressure ulcers (by 25%). Although studies suggest ONS and ETF may improve healing of PU, further research to confirm this trend is required.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2005
Additional Information: Review Article
Keywords: meta-analysis, supplement, enteral, formula, pressure sores, decubitus, wound healing, prevention, nutrition

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 25999
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/25999
ISSN: 1568-1637
PURE UUID: dd825b1d-5811-4099-8894-3fcd7394e6a7

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Apr 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:07

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Rebecca J. Stratton
Author: Anna-Christina Ek
Author: Meike Engfer
Author: Zena Moore
Author: Paul Rigby
Author: Robert Wolfe
Author: Marinos Elia

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×