Mind, Machines and Searle II: What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument?


Harnad, Stevan (2001) Mind, Machines and Searle II: What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument? In, Bishop, M. and Preston, J. (eds.) Essays on Searle's Chinese Room Argument. Oxford University Press

This is the latest version of this item.

Download

[img] HTML searlbook.htm - Other
Download (46kB)

Description/Abstract

Searle's Chinese Room Argument showed a fatal flaw in computationalism (the idea that mental states are just computational states) and helped usher in the era of situated robotics and symbol grounding (although Searle himself thought neuroscience was the only correct way to understand the mind).

Item Type: Book Section
Additional Information: Address: Oxford
Venue - Dates: Essays on Searle's Chinese Room Argument, 2001-01-01
Related URLs:
Keywords: searle, computation, cognition, functionalism, consciousness, Turing test
Organisations: Web & Internet Science
ePrint ID: 260240
Date :
Date Event
2001Published
Date Deposited: 07 Jan 2005
Last Modified: 17 Apr 2017 22:16
Further Information:Google Scholar
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/260240

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item