The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

High-quality nutrition counselling for hypercholesterolaemia by public health nurses in rural areas does not affect total blood cholesterol - commentary

High-quality nutrition counselling for hypercholesterolaemia by public health nurses in rural areas does not affect total blood cholesterol - commentary
High-quality nutrition counselling for hypercholesterolaemia by public health nurses in rural areas does not affect total blood cholesterol - commentary
Background: Diet affects coronary heart disease(CHD). People living in remote areas seldom have access to nutritionist-based intervention strategies exist to improve dietary behaviour. It has been suggested thata public health nurse-based nutrition counselling service might be benefit people with hypercholesterolaemiain rural areas.
Objective: To assess the effectiveness in rural areas of an intervention programme by public health nurses in facilitating dietary counselling for hypercholesterolaemia.
Setting: Rural county health departments in North Carolina, United States; recruitment August 1994 to November 1996.
Method: Cluster randomised controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS Seventeen rural county health departments (incorporating 468 individuals) were randomised. Individuals were included if they were aged between 20 and 70 years; had a total cholesterol levelof >4.7mmol/L within the previous 12 months, and were not being treated for hypercholesterolaemia (either medication- or counselling-based). People with severe chronic or acute medical conditions were excluded from the initial screen. People screened were then enrolled in the study if their low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) was either >100mg/dL (2.59mmol/L) with known coronary heart disease (CHD), 130 to 159mg/dL (3.37 to 4.12mmol/L) with two or more CHD risk factors, or >4160mg/dL (4.14mmol/L).
Intervention: The control ‘minimum’ intervention (nine departments; 252 people) consisted of routine counselling for high cholesterol by a public health nurse. The special intervention (eight departments; 216 people) comprised three individual diet counselling sessions by a public health nurse, referral to a nutritionist if lipid goals were not attained after 3 months and a follow-up phone call and newsletters. Follow-up was 12 months.
Main Outcomes: Total cholesterol, LDL-C, body weight and dietary risk assessment (DRA) score based on a food frequency questionnaire.
Main Results: There was no significant difference in the total reduction of blood cholesterol between the two groups at either 3 (p=0.9) or12months (p=0.6) follow-up. Weight loss was significantly greater in the special group at 3 (p=0.02) and 6 months (p=0.04), but not by 12 months (p=0.13). The average reduction in total dietary risk assessment score (indicating dietary improvement) was significantly greater in the special intervention group at both 3 (p=0.0006) and 12 months (p=0.005) follow -up.
Author's Conclusions: Intensive dietary counselling does not seem to improve blood cholesterol compared with minimal counselling.
1462-9410
187-189
Thompson, R.L.
1a394a6d-b006-4aec-b9be-b3e6c16fdb7b
Thompson, R.L.
1a394a6d-b006-4aec-b9be-b3e6c16fdb7b

Thompson, R.L. (2005) High-quality nutrition counselling for hypercholesterolaemia by public health nurses in rural areas does not affect total blood cholesterol - commentary. Evidence-based HealthCare, 7 (4), 187-189.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Background: Diet affects coronary heart disease(CHD). People living in remote areas seldom have access to nutritionist-based intervention strategies exist to improve dietary behaviour. It has been suggested thata public health nurse-based nutrition counselling service might be benefit people with hypercholesterolaemiain rural areas.
Objective: To assess the effectiveness in rural areas of an intervention programme by public health nurses in facilitating dietary counselling for hypercholesterolaemia.
Setting: Rural county health departments in North Carolina, United States; recruitment August 1994 to November 1996.
Method: Cluster randomised controlled trial. PARTICIPANTS Seventeen rural county health departments (incorporating 468 individuals) were randomised. Individuals were included if they were aged between 20 and 70 years; had a total cholesterol levelof >4.7mmol/L within the previous 12 months, and were not being treated for hypercholesterolaemia (either medication- or counselling-based). People with severe chronic or acute medical conditions were excluded from the initial screen. People screened were then enrolled in the study if their low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) was either >100mg/dL (2.59mmol/L) with known coronary heart disease (CHD), 130 to 159mg/dL (3.37 to 4.12mmol/L) with two or more CHD risk factors, or >4160mg/dL (4.14mmol/L).
Intervention: The control ‘minimum’ intervention (nine departments; 252 people) consisted of routine counselling for high cholesterol by a public health nurse. The special intervention (eight departments; 216 people) comprised three individual diet counselling sessions by a public health nurse, referral to a nutritionist if lipid goals were not attained after 3 months and a follow-up phone call and newsletters. Follow-up was 12 months.
Main Outcomes: Total cholesterol, LDL-C, body weight and dietary risk assessment (DRA) score based on a food frequency questionnaire.
Main Results: There was no significant difference in the total reduction of blood cholesterol between the two groups at either 3 (p=0.9) or12months (p=0.6) follow-up. Weight loss was significantly greater in the special group at 3 (p=0.02) and 6 months (p=0.04), but not by 12 months (p=0.13). The average reduction in total dietary risk assessment score (indicating dietary improvement) was significantly greater in the special intervention group at both 3 (p=0.0006) and 12 months (p=0.005) follow -up.
Author's Conclusions: Intensive dietary counselling does not seem to improve blood cholesterol compared with minimal counselling.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2005

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 26034
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/26034
ISSN: 1462-9410
PURE UUID: 3bcff88f-9a07-4dac-80cc-80ac54d25ef0

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 20 Apr 2006
Last modified: 22 Jul 2022 20:32

Export record

Contributors

Author: R.L. Thompson

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×