The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Delivery, Management and Access Model for E-prints and Open Access Journals within Further and Higher Education

Delivery, Management and Access Model for E-prints and Open Access Journals within Further and Higher Education
Delivery, Management and Access Model for E-prints and Open Access Journals within Further and Higher Education
This study identified three models for open access provision in the UK: (a) the centralised model, where e-prints of articles are first deposited directly into a national archive and then made accessible to users and service providers; (b) the distributed model, where e-prints are deposited in any one of a distributed network of OAI-compliant institutional, subject-based and open-access journal archives, whose metadata are then harvested and made accessible to users and service providers; and (c) the model we have termed the ‘harvesting’ model, a variant of the distributed model in which the harvested metadata are first improved, standardised or enhanced before being made accessible to users and service providers. In considering the relative merits of these models, we addressed not only technical concerns but also how e-print provision (by authors) can be achieved, since without this content provision there can be no effective e-print delivery service (for users). For technical and cultural reasons, this study recommends that the centralised model should not be adopted for the proposed UK service. This would have been the costliest option and it would have omitted the growing body of content in distributed institutional, subject-based, and open-access journal archives. Moreover, the central archiving approach is the ‘wrong way round’ with respect to e-print provision since for reasons of academic and institutional culture and so long as effective measures are implemented, individual institution-based e-print archives are far more likely to fill (and fill quickly) than centralised archives, because institutions and researchers share a vested interested in the impact of their research output, and because institutions are in a position to mandate and monitor compliance, a position not enjoyed by centralised archives. The study therefore recommends the ‘harvesting’ model [(c) above], constituting a UK national service founded upon creating an interoperable network of OAI-compliant, distributed, institution-based e-print archives. Such a service, based on harvesting metadata (and, later, full-text) from distributed, institution-based e-print archives and open access journals would be cheaper to implement and would more effectively garner the nation’s scholarly research output. The model also permits further enhancement of the metadata to provide improved features and functionality.
open access, eprints, self-archiving, institutional repositories, distributed archiving, open archives initiative
Swan, Alma
d73a0e90-27d6-43ee-aafd-118902254de7
Needham, Paul
ff491a8e-cbbf-4cdd-a31f-be929a8f953e
Probets, Steve
a6af150d-090b-4c2f-85f9-d11d17ce28cd
Muir, Adrienne
717670b3-f8c2-4314-a0e5-2f9072bb97d0
Oppenheim, Charles
d59091c1-26e9-43dd-a5e9-8308177d78c5
O’Brien, Ann
2f7236aa-d16b-4c09-a607-a74d8ac879ba
Hardy, Rachel
c9073775-07df-4689-8a6e-1a13c28a9c7f
Rowland, Fytton
2b5c6bde-e65d-4f1b-aef7-515f9be60027
Swan, Alma
d73a0e90-27d6-43ee-aafd-118902254de7
Needham, Paul
ff491a8e-cbbf-4cdd-a31f-be929a8f953e
Probets, Steve
a6af150d-090b-4c2f-85f9-d11d17ce28cd
Muir, Adrienne
717670b3-f8c2-4314-a0e5-2f9072bb97d0
Oppenheim, Charles
d59091c1-26e9-43dd-a5e9-8308177d78c5
O’Brien, Ann
2f7236aa-d16b-4c09-a607-a74d8ac879ba
Hardy, Rachel
c9073775-07df-4689-8a6e-1a13c28a9c7f
Rowland, Fytton
2b5c6bde-e65d-4f1b-aef7-515f9be60027

Swan, Alma, Needham, Paul, Probets, Steve, Muir, Adrienne, Oppenheim, Charles, O’Brien, Ann, Hardy, Rachel and Rowland, Fytton (2005) Delivery, Management and Access Model for E-prints and Open Access Journals within Further and Higher Education

Record type: Monograph (Project Report)

Abstract

This study identified three models for open access provision in the UK: (a) the centralised model, where e-prints of articles are first deposited directly into a national archive and then made accessible to users and service providers; (b) the distributed model, where e-prints are deposited in any one of a distributed network of OAI-compliant institutional, subject-based and open-access journal archives, whose metadata are then harvested and made accessible to users and service providers; and (c) the model we have termed the ‘harvesting’ model, a variant of the distributed model in which the harvested metadata are first improved, standardised or enhanced before being made accessible to users and service providers. In considering the relative merits of these models, we addressed not only technical concerns but also how e-print provision (by authors) can be achieved, since without this content provision there can be no effective e-print delivery service (for users). For technical and cultural reasons, this study recommends that the centralised model should not be adopted for the proposed UK service. This would have been the costliest option and it would have omitted the growing body of content in distributed institutional, subject-based, and open-access journal archives. Moreover, the central archiving approach is the ‘wrong way round’ with respect to e-print provision since for reasons of academic and institutional culture and so long as effective measures are implemented, individual institution-based e-print archives are far more likely to fill (and fill quickly) than centralised archives, because institutions and researchers share a vested interested in the impact of their research output, and because institutions are in a position to mandate and monitor compliance, a position not enjoyed by centralised archives. The study therefore recommends the ‘harvesting’ model [(c) above], constituting a UK national service founded upon creating an interoperable network of OAI-compliant, distributed, institution-based e-print archives. Such a service, based on harvesting metadata (and, later, full-text) from distributed, institution-based e-print archives and open access journals would be cheaper to implement and would more effectively garner the nation’s scholarly research output. The model also permits further enhancement of the metadata to provide improved features and functionality.

Text
E-prints_delivery_model.pdf - Other
Download (667kB)

More information

Published date: 2005
Additional Information: JISC Study on central vs. distributed archiving
Keywords: open access, eprints, self-archiving, institutional repositories, distributed archiving, open archives initiative
Organisations: Web & Internet Science

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 261001
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/261001
PURE UUID: 675dbe6d-2c23-4f39-a7a1-fe45031bc0a1

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 19 Jun 2005
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 06:46

Export record

Contributors

Author: Alma Swan
Author: Paul Needham
Author: Steve Probets
Author: Adrienne Muir
Author: Charles Oppenheim
Author: Ann O’Brien
Author: Rachel Hardy
Author: Fytton Rowland

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×