The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Neonatal anthropometry: the thin-fat Indian baby. The Pune Maternal Nutrition Study

Neonatal anthropometry: the thin-fat Indian baby. The Pune Maternal Nutrition Study
Neonatal anthropometry: the thin-fat Indian baby. The Pune Maternal Nutrition Study
OBJECTIVE: To examine body size and fat measurements of babies born in rural India and compare them with white Caucasian babies born in an industrialised country.
DESIGN: Community-based observational study in rural India, and comparison with data from an earlier study in the UK, measured using similar methods.
SUBJECTS: A total of 631 term babies born in six rural villages, near the city of Pune, Maharashtra, India, and 338 term babies born in the Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK.
MEASUREMENTS: Maternal weight and height, and neonatal weight, length, head, mid-upper-arm and abdominal circumferences, subscapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses, and placental weight.
RESULTS: The Indian mothers were younger, lighter, shorter and had a lower mean body mass index (BMI) (mean age, weight, height and BMI: 21.4 y, 44.6 kg, 1.52 m, and 18.2 kg/m2) than Southampton mothers (26.8 y, 63.6 kg, 1.63 m and 23.4 kg/m2). They gave birth to lighter babies (mean birthweight: 2.7 kg compared with 3.5 kg). Compared to Southampton babies, the Indian babies were small in all body measurements, the smallest being abdominal circumference (s.d. score: -2.38; 95% CI: -2.48 to -2.29) and mid-arm circumference (s.d. score: -1.82; 95% CI: -1.89 to -1.75), while the most preserved measurement was the subscapular skinfold thickness (s.d. score: -0.53; 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.46). Skinfolds were relatively preserved in the lightest babies (below the 10th percentile of birthweight) in both populations.
CONCLUSIONS: Small Indian babies have small abdominal viscera and low muscle mass, but preserve body fat during their intrauterine development. This body composition may persist postnatally and predispose to an insulin-resistant state.
Indian babies, body size, muscle, body fat, insulin resistance syndrome, thrifty phenotype
173-180
Yajnik, C. S.
cf37e5f8-0cd1-4509-b26f-85ac9c79f41c
Fall, C. H.
7171a105-34f5-4131-89d7-1aa639893b18
Coyaji, K. J.
284568bc-1b3b-4321-b10f-98a86704f1bf
Hirve, S. S.
b191b708-15d3-43dd-906c-12065a9640d7
Rao, S.
4ce8bb49-9873-4afc-adf6-34860a285f51
Barker, D. J. P.
963dd42f-0bfc-46f5-87b0-1ba13c545500
Joglekar, C.
70e3e271-1071-46f2-9986-790d7e8fea6b
Kellingray, S.
418e1aef-0230-450a-a9b7-ba8cf0e7fba9
Yajnik, C. S.
cf37e5f8-0cd1-4509-b26f-85ac9c79f41c
Fall, C. H.
7171a105-34f5-4131-89d7-1aa639893b18
Coyaji, K. J.
284568bc-1b3b-4321-b10f-98a86704f1bf
Hirve, S. S.
b191b708-15d3-43dd-906c-12065a9640d7
Rao, S.
4ce8bb49-9873-4afc-adf6-34860a285f51
Barker, D. J. P.
963dd42f-0bfc-46f5-87b0-1ba13c545500
Joglekar, C.
70e3e271-1071-46f2-9986-790d7e8fea6b
Kellingray, S.
418e1aef-0230-450a-a9b7-ba8cf0e7fba9

Yajnik, C. S., Fall, C. H., Coyaji, K. J., Hirve, S. S., Rao, S., Barker, D. J. P., Joglekar, C. and Kellingray, S. (2003) Neonatal anthropometry: the thin-fat Indian baby. The Pune Maternal Nutrition Study. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders, 27 (2), 173-180. (doi:10.1038/sj.ijo.802219).

Record type: Article

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine body size and fat measurements of babies born in rural India and compare them with white Caucasian babies born in an industrialised country.
DESIGN: Community-based observational study in rural India, and comparison with data from an earlier study in the UK, measured using similar methods.
SUBJECTS: A total of 631 term babies born in six rural villages, near the city of Pune, Maharashtra, India, and 338 term babies born in the Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton, UK.
MEASUREMENTS: Maternal weight and height, and neonatal weight, length, head, mid-upper-arm and abdominal circumferences, subscapular and triceps skinfold thicknesses, and placental weight.
RESULTS: The Indian mothers were younger, lighter, shorter and had a lower mean body mass index (BMI) (mean age, weight, height and BMI: 21.4 y, 44.6 kg, 1.52 m, and 18.2 kg/m2) than Southampton mothers (26.8 y, 63.6 kg, 1.63 m and 23.4 kg/m2). They gave birth to lighter babies (mean birthweight: 2.7 kg compared with 3.5 kg). Compared to Southampton babies, the Indian babies were small in all body measurements, the smallest being abdominal circumference (s.d. score: -2.38; 95% CI: -2.48 to -2.29) and mid-arm circumference (s.d. score: -1.82; 95% CI: -1.89 to -1.75), while the most preserved measurement was the subscapular skinfold thickness (s.d. score: -0.53; 95% CI: -0.61 to -0.46). Skinfolds were relatively preserved in the lightest babies (below the 10th percentile of birthweight) in both populations.
CONCLUSIONS: Small Indian babies have small abdominal viscera and low muscle mass, but preserve body fat during their intrauterine development. This body composition may persist postnatally and predispose to an insulin-resistant state.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2003
Keywords: Indian babies, body size, muscle, body fat, insulin resistance syndrome, thrifty phenotype

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 26137
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/26137
PURE UUID: 412d94a5-8f40-4eaa-8927-0af34ce1322d
ORCID for C. H. Fall: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-4402-5552

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 07 Apr 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:38

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: C. S. Yajnik
Author: C. H. Fall ORCID iD
Author: K. J. Coyaji
Author: S. S. Hirve
Author: S. Rao
Author: D. J. P. Barker
Author: C. Joglekar
Author: S. Kellingray

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×