The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Evolution of market mechanism through a continuous space of auction-types II: Two-sided auction mechanisms evolve in response to market shocks

Evolution of market mechanism through a continuous space of auction-types II: Two-sided auction mechanisms evolve in response to market shocks
Evolution of market mechanism through a continuous space of auction-types II: Two-sided auction mechanisms evolve in response to market shocks
This paper describes the use of a genetic algorithm (GA) to find parameter-values for trading agents that operate in virtual “e-marketplaces”, where the rules of the marketplaces are also under simultaneous control of the GA. The aim is to use the GA to automatically design new agent-based e-marketplaces that are more efficient than markets designed by (or populated by) humans. Das et al. (2001) recently demonstrated that ZIP software-agent traders consistently outperform human traders in Continuous Double Auction (CDA) marketplaces. Cliff (2001b) used a GA to explore a continuous space of auction mechanisms, with ZIP traders simultaneously evolving to operate efficiently in these evolved markets. The space of possible auction-types explored includes the CDA and also two purely one-sided mechanisms. Surprisingly, the GA did not settle on the CDA. Instead, in two experiments, optima were found at a one-sided auction mechanism; and in a third experiment a novel hybrid auction mechanism partway between the CDA and a onesided auction was evolved. This paper extends that research by studying the auction mechanisms that evolve when the market supply and demand schedules undergo a sudden “shock” change half-way through the evaluation process. It is shown that hybrid market mechanisms (again partway between the CDA and a one-sided mechanism) can evolve in place of the one-sided solutions that evolve when there are no market shocks. Furthermore it is demonstrated that the precise nature of the hybrid auction that evolves is dependent on the nature of the shock. These results indicate that the evolution of one-sided mechanisms reported by Cliff (2001b) is an artefact of using single fixed schedules, and that in general two-sided auctions will evolve. These two-sided auctions may be hybrids unlike any human-designed auction and yet may also be significantly more efficient than any human designed market mechanism.
682-688
Cliff, Dave
693f4867-967f-426b-8551-b60c8494ee62
Arabnia, H.R.
18056ad3-d224-4d47-9e6f-fa420761d8bc
Mun, Y.
63a577bf-f8d4-4e34-969b-d5060c3f09d6
Cliff, Dave
693f4867-967f-426b-8551-b60c8494ee62
Arabnia, H.R.
18056ad3-d224-4d47-9e6f-fa420761d8bc
Mun, Y.
63a577bf-f8d4-4e34-969b-d5060c3f09d6

Cliff, Dave (2002) Evolution of market mechanism through a continuous space of auction-types II: Two-sided auction mechanisms evolve in response to market shocks. Arabnia, H.R. and Mun, Y. (eds.) International Conference on Internet Computing (IC 2002), , Las Vegas, NV, United States. 24 - 27 Jun 2002. pp. 682-688 .

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Other)

Abstract

This paper describes the use of a genetic algorithm (GA) to find parameter-values for trading agents that operate in virtual “e-marketplaces”, where the rules of the marketplaces are also under simultaneous control of the GA. The aim is to use the GA to automatically design new agent-based e-marketplaces that are more efficient than markets designed by (or populated by) humans. Das et al. (2001) recently demonstrated that ZIP software-agent traders consistently outperform human traders in Continuous Double Auction (CDA) marketplaces. Cliff (2001b) used a GA to explore a continuous space of auction mechanisms, with ZIP traders simultaneously evolving to operate efficiently in these evolved markets. The space of possible auction-types explored includes the CDA and also two purely one-sided mechanisms. Surprisingly, the GA did not settle on the CDA. Instead, in two experiments, optima were found at a one-sided auction mechanism; and in a third experiment a novel hybrid auction mechanism partway between the CDA and a onesided auction was evolved. This paper extends that research by studying the auction mechanisms that evolve when the market supply and demand schedules undergo a sudden “shock” change half-way through the evaluation process. It is shown that hybrid market mechanisms (again partway between the CDA and a one-sided mechanism) can evolve in place of the one-sided solutions that evolve when there are no market shocks. Furthermore it is demonstrated that the precise nature of the hybrid auction that evolves is dependent on the nature of the shock. These results indicate that the evolution of one-sided mechanisms reported by Cliff (2001b) is an artefact of using single fixed schedules, and that in general two-sided auctions will evolve. These two-sided auctions may be hybrids unlike any human-designed auction and yet may also be significantly more efficient than any human designed market mechanism.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2002
Additional Information: Event Dates: June 2002
Venue - Dates: International Conference on Internet Computing (IC 2002), , Las Vegas, NV, United States, 2002-06-24 - 2002-06-27
Organisations: Electronics & Computer Science

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 262133
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/262133
PURE UUID: 5e6b50c6-9f82-45ba-ae54-9c7978bc4266

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 29 Mar 2006
Last modified: 03 Jul 2023 16:38

Export record

Contributors

Author: Dave Cliff
Editor: H.R. Arabnia
Editor: Y. Mun

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×