Competing sellers in online markets: reserve prices, shill bidding and auction fees
Competing sellers in online markets: reserve prices, shill bidding and auction fees
In this paper, we consider competition between sellers offering similar items in concurrent online auctions, where each seller must set its individual auction parameters (such as the reserve price) in such a way as to attract buyers. We show that there exists a pure Nash equilibrium in the case of two sellers with asymmetric production costs. In addition, we show that, rather than setting a reserve price, a seller can further improve its utility by shill bidding (i.e., pretending to be a buyer in order to bid in its own auction). But, using an evolutionary simulation, we show that this shill bidding introduces inefficiencies within the market. However, we then go on to show that these inefficiencies can be reduced when the mediating auction institution uses appropriate auction fees that deter sellers from submitting shill bids.
Mechanism Design, Competition, Shill Bidding, Auction Fees
1208-1210
Gerding, E.H.
d9e92ee5-1a8c-4467-a689-8363e7743362
Rogers, A.
f9130bc6-da32-474e-9fab-6c6cb8077fdc
Dash, R.K.
688bf118-f42f-42bc-80f7-e915330f85d5
Jennings, N. R.
ab3d94cc-247c-4545-9d1e-65873d6cdb30
2006
Gerding, E.H.
d9e92ee5-1a8c-4467-a689-8363e7743362
Rogers, A.
f9130bc6-da32-474e-9fab-6c6cb8077fdc
Dash, R.K.
688bf118-f42f-42bc-80f7-e915330f85d5
Jennings, N. R.
ab3d94cc-247c-4545-9d1e-65873d6cdb30
Gerding, E.H., Rogers, A., Dash, R.K. and Jennings, N. R.
(2006)
Competing sellers in online markets: reserve prices, shill bidding and auction fees.
Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-06), Halodate, Japan.
08 - 12 May 2006.
.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Paper)
Abstract
In this paper, we consider competition between sellers offering similar items in concurrent online auctions, where each seller must set its individual auction parameters (such as the reserve price) in such a way as to attract buyers. We show that there exists a pure Nash equilibrium in the case of two sellers with asymmetric production costs. In addition, we show that, rather than setting a reserve price, a seller can further improve its utility by shill bidding (i.e., pretending to be a buyer in order to bid in its own auction). But, using an evolutionary simulation, we show that this shill bidding introduces inefficiencies within the market. However, we then go on to show that these inefficiencies can be reduced when the mediating auction institution uses appropriate auction fees that deter sellers from submitting shill bids.
Text
aamas06.enrico.pdf
- Other
More information
Published date: 2006
Venue - Dates:
Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-06), Halodate, Japan, 2006-05-08 - 2006-05-12
Keywords:
Mechanism Design, Competition, Shill Bidding, Auction Fees
Organisations:
Agents, Interactions & Complexity
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 262585
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/262585
PURE UUID: 08eddea5-d4c0-42e0-97a9-d99d9a369b11
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 16 May 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:23
Export record
Contributors
Author:
E.H. Gerding
Author:
A. Rogers
Author:
R.K. Dash
Author:
N. R. Jennings
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics