Antibody specificity controls in vivo effector mechanisms of anti-CD20 reagents
Antibody specificity controls in vivo effector mechanisms of anti-CD20 reagents
Despite the success of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in the treatment of lymphoma, there remains considerable uncertainty about their mechanism(s) of action. Here, we show that certain of these reagents (rituximab and 1F5), which redistribute CD20 into membrane rafts, are bound efficiently by C1q, deposit C3b, and result in complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). This activity is important in vivo, because complement depletion using cobra venom factor (CVF) markedly reduced the efficacy of rituximab and 1F5 in 2 lymphoma xenograft models. However, complement depletion had no effect on the potent therapeutic activity of B1, a mAb that does not redistribute CD20 into membrane rafts, bind C1q, or cause efficient CDC. Equivalent immunotherapy also occurred in the presence or absence of natural killer (NK) cells. Perhaps most surprising was the observation that F(ab')2 fragments of B1 but not 1F5 were able to provide substantial immunotherapy, indicating that non-Fc-dependent mechanisms are involved with B1. In accordance with this, B1 was shown to induce much higher levels of apoptosis than rituximab and 1F5. Thus, although complement is important for the action of rituximab and 1F5, this is not so for B1, which more likely functions through its ability to signal apoptosis.
2738-2743
Cragg, Mark S.
ec97f80e-f3c8-49b7-a960-20dff648b78c
Glennie, Martin J.
9f6f0eff-4560-48c2-80cd-0ec116110ded
2004
Cragg, Mark S.
ec97f80e-f3c8-49b7-a960-20dff648b78c
Glennie, Martin J.
9f6f0eff-4560-48c2-80cd-0ec116110ded
Cragg, Mark S. and Glennie, Martin J.
(2004)
Antibody specificity controls in vivo effector mechanisms of anti-CD20 reagents.
Blood, 103 (7), .
(doi:10.1182/blood-2003-06-2031).
Abstract
Despite the success of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) in the treatment of lymphoma, there remains considerable uncertainty about their mechanism(s) of action. Here, we show that certain of these reagents (rituximab and 1F5), which redistribute CD20 into membrane rafts, are bound efficiently by C1q, deposit C3b, and result in complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC). This activity is important in vivo, because complement depletion using cobra venom factor (CVF) markedly reduced the efficacy of rituximab and 1F5 in 2 lymphoma xenograft models. However, complement depletion had no effect on the potent therapeutic activity of B1, a mAb that does not redistribute CD20 into membrane rafts, bind C1q, or cause efficient CDC. Equivalent immunotherapy also occurred in the presence or absence of natural killer (NK) cells. Perhaps most surprising was the observation that F(ab')2 fragments of B1 but not 1F5 were able to provide substantial immunotherapy, indicating that non-Fc-dependent mechanisms are involved with B1. In accordance with this, B1 was shown to induce much higher levels of apoptosis than rituximab and 1F5. Thus, although complement is important for the action of rituximab and 1F5, this is not so for B1, which more likely functions through its ability to signal apoptosis.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2004
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 26262
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/26262
ISSN: 0006-4971
PURE UUID: 5f6b83bc-937d-4749-92ed-4a8d153e5f06
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Apr 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:58
Export record
Altmetrics
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics