The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO

A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO
A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO
Purpose: To develop a simple scoring system for the likelihood of identifying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.
Methods: DNA samples from affected subjects from 422 non-Jewish families with a history of breast and/or ovarian cancer were screened for BRCA1 mutations and a subset of 318 was screened for BRCA2 by whole gene screening techniques. Using a combination of results from screening and the family history of mutation negative and positive kindreds, a simple scoring system (Manchester scoring system) was devised to predict pathogenic mutations and particularly to discriminate at the 10% likelihood level. A second separate dataset of 192 samples was subsequently used to test the model’s predictive value. This was further validated on a third set of 258 samples and compared against existing models.
Results: The scoring system includes a cut-off at 10 points for each gene. This equates to >10% probability of a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 individually. The Manchester scoring system had the best trade-off between sensitivity and specificity at 10% prediction for the presence of mutations as shown by its highest C-statistic and was far superior to BRCAPRO.
Conclusion: The scoring system is useful in identifying mutations particularly in BRCA2. The algorithm may need modifying to include pathological data when calculating whether to screen for BRCA1 mutations. It is considerably less time-consuming for clinicians than using computer models and if implemented routinely in clinical practice will aid in selecting families most suitable for DNA sampling for diagnostic testing.
brca1, brca2, breast cancer, mutation analysis, ovarian cancer, triage
0022-2593
474-480
Evans, D. G. R.
52a9dd99-c26e-4805-aafd-abc104097c70
Eccles, D. M.
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Rahman, N.
6b59a4f8-b2c5-46a3-a660-66baab614029
Young, K.
33daac74-a29f-4676-9a99-c86ab703ecd8
Bulman, M.
e374fd90-b1f6-432e-86a8-7b3c8a768189
Amir, E.
3dea4cd2-ffde-4435-8e67-08bc8f84f55f
Shenton, A.
fd74c39a-da08-4ea0-943a-f67f7c79205b
Howell, A.
d66cb75b-55f5-4b55-bdff-79a7536aec10
Lalloo, F.
60a2edba-59dd-4e37-9b3d-9eff7f8f7106
Evans, D. G. R.
52a9dd99-c26e-4805-aafd-abc104097c70
Eccles, D. M.
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Rahman, N.
6b59a4f8-b2c5-46a3-a660-66baab614029
Young, K.
33daac74-a29f-4676-9a99-c86ab703ecd8
Bulman, M.
e374fd90-b1f6-432e-86a8-7b3c8a768189
Amir, E.
3dea4cd2-ffde-4435-8e67-08bc8f84f55f
Shenton, A.
fd74c39a-da08-4ea0-943a-f67f7c79205b
Howell, A.
d66cb75b-55f5-4b55-bdff-79a7536aec10
Lalloo, F.
60a2edba-59dd-4e37-9b3d-9eff7f8f7106

Evans, D. G. R., Eccles, D. M., Rahman, N., Young, K., Bulman, M., Amir, E., Shenton, A., Howell, A. and Lalloo, F. (2004) A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO. Journal of Medical Genetics, 41 (6), 474-480.

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: To develop a simple scoring system for the likelihood of identifying a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.
Methods: DNA samples from affected subjects from 422 non-Jewish families with a history of breast and/or ovarian cancer were screened for BRCA1 mutations and a subset of 318 was screened for BRCA2 by whole gene screening techniques. Using a combination of results from screening and the family history of mutation negative and positive kindreds, a simple scoring system (Manchester scoring system) was devised to predict pathogenic mutations and particularly to discriminate at the 10% likelihood level. A second separate dataset of 192 samples was subsequently used to test the model’s predictive value. This was further validated on a third set of 258 samples and compared against existing models.
Results: The scoring system includes a cut-off at 10 points for each gene. This equates to >10% probability of a pathogenic mutation in BRCA1 and BRCA2 individually. The Manchester scoring system had the best trade-off between sensitivity and specificity at 10% prediction for the presence of mutations as shown by its highest C-statistic and was far superior to BRCAPRO.
Conclusion: The scoring system is useful in identifying mutations particularly in BRCA2. The algorithm may need modifying to include pathological data when calculating whether to screen for BRCA1 mutations. It is considerably less time-consuming for clinicians than using computer models and if implemented routinely in clinical practice will aid in selecting families most suitable for DNA sampling for diagnostic testing.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2004
Additional Information: Medical genetics in practice
Keywords: brca1, brca2, breast cancer, mutation analysis, ovarian cancer, triage

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 26299
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/26299
ISSN: 0022-2593
PURE UUID: d678051c-1f85-44bd-9835-4ab1f77aa4ab
ORCID for D. M. Eccles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9935-3169

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 21 Apr 2006
Last modified: 23 Jul 2022 01:34

Export record

Contributors

Author: D. G. R. Evans
Author: D. M. Eccles ORCID iD
Author: N. Rahman
Author: K. Young
Author: M. Bulman
Author: E. Amir
Author: A. Shenton
Author: A. Howell
Author: F. Lalloo

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×