The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Optimizing OA Self-Archiving Mandates: What? Where? When? Why? How?

Harnad, Stevan (2006) Optimizing OA Self-Archiving Mandates: What? Where? When? Why? How? s.n.

Record type: Monograph (Project Report)

Abstract

With the adoption of Open Access Self-Archiving Mandates worldwide so near, this is the opportune time to think of optimizing how they are formulated. Seemingly small parametric or verbal variants can make a vast difference to their success, speed, and completeness of coverage: --What to mandate: The primary target content is the author's final, peer-reviewed draft ("postprint") of all journal articles accepted for publication. --Why to mandate self-archiving: The purpose of mandating OA self-archiving is to maximize research usage and impact by maximizing user access to research findings. --Where to self-archive: The optimal locus for self-archiving is the author's own OAI-compliant Institutional Repository (IR). (It is highly inadvisable to mandate direct deposit in a Central Repository (CR) -- whether discipline-based, funder-based, multidisciplinary or national. The right way to get OA content into CRs is to harvest it from the IRs (via the OAI protocol).) --When to self-archive: The author's final, peer-reviewed draft (postprint) should be deposited in the author's IR immediately upon acceptance for publication. (The deposit must be immediate; any allowable delay or embargo should apply only to the access-setting, i.e., whether access to the deposited article is immediately set to Open Access or provisionally set to Closed Access, in which only the author can access the deposited text.) --How to self-archive: Depositing a postprint in an author's IR and keying in its metadata (author, title, journal, date, etc.) takes less than 10 minutes per paper. Deposit analyses comparing mandated and unmandated self-archiving rates have shown that mandates (and only mandates) work, with self-archiving approaching 100% of annual institutional research output within a few years. Without a mandate, IR content just hovers for years at the spontaneous 15% self-archiving rate.

HTML arch.html - Other
Download (14kB)

More information

Published date: October 2006
Keywords: open access, self-archiving, research policy, research impact, citation, institutional repositories, central repositories, self-archiving mandates, institutional policy, funder policy, frpaa, rcuk, nih, pubmed central
Organisations: Web & Internet Science

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 263098
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/263098
PURE UUID: cd123678-97cc-4404-be8f-21259c07fd40

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 13 Oct 2006
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 08:44

Export record

Contributors

Author: Stevan Harnad

University divisions

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×