The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Citation Advantage For OA Self-Archiving Is Independent of Journal Impact Factor, Article Age, and Number of Co-Authors

Record type: Monograph (Project Report)

Eysenbach has suggested that the OA (Green) self-archiving advantage might just be an artifact of potential uncontrolled confounding factors such as article age (older articles may be both more cited and more likely to be self-archived), number of authors (articles with more authors might be more cited and more self-archived), subject matter (the subjects that are cited more, self-archive more), country (same thing), number of authors, citation counts of authors, etc. Chawki Hajjem (doctoral candidate, UQaM) had already shown that the OA advantage was present in all cases when articles were analysed separately by age, subject matter or country. He has now done a multiple regression analysis jointly testing (1) article age, (2) journal impact factor, (3) number of authors, and (4) OA self-archiving as separate factors for 442,750 articles in 576 (biomedical) journals across 11 years, and has shown that each of the four factors contributes an independent, statistically significant increment to the citation counts. The OA-self-archiving advantage remains a robust, independent factor. Having successfully responded to his challenge, we now challenge Eysenbach to demonstrate -- by testing a sufficiently broad and representative sample of journals at all levels of the journal quality, visibility and prestige hierarchy -- that his finding of a citation advantage for Gold OA (articles published OA on the high-profile website of the only journal he tested (PNAS) over Green OA articles in the same journal (self-archived on the author's website) was not just an artifact of having tested only one very high-profile journal.

HTML eysen.html - Other
Download (18kB)
Image (GIF) multireg.gif - Other
Download (306kB)
PDF eysen.pdf - Other
Download (369kB)

Citation

Hajjem, Chawki and Harnad, Stevan (2007) Citation Advantage For OA Self-Archiving Is Independent of Journal Impact Factor, Article Age, and Number of Co-Authors s.n.

More information

Published date: January 2007
Additional Information: Commentary On: http://biology.plosjournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157
Keywords: open access, self-archiving, citation, research impact, impact factor, methodology, scientometrics, mandates
Organisations: Web & Internet Science

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 263329
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/263329
PURE UUID: 1a3545d2-7671-4c74-a35b-07d82028f762

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 22 Jan 2007
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 07:46

Export record

Contributors

Author: Chawki Hajjem
Author: Stevan Harnad

University divisions


Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×