A Study of Quality Issues for Image Auto-Annotation with the Corel Data-Set
A Study of Quality Issues for Image Auto-Annotation with the Corel Data-Set
 
  The Corel Image set is widely used for image annotation performance evaluation although it has been claimed that Corel images are relatively easy to annotate. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate some of the disadvantages of data-sets like the Corel set for effective auto-annotation evaluation. We first compare the performance of several annotation algorithms using the Corel set and find that simple near neighbour propagation techniques perform fairly well. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) based annotation method achieves even better results, almost as good as the best found in the literature. We then build a new image collection using the Yahoo Image Search engine and query-by-single-word searches to create a more challenging annotated set automatically. Then, using three very different image annotation methods, we demonstrate some of the problems of annotation using the Corel set compared with the Yahoo based training set. In both cases the training sets are used to create a set of annotations for the Corel test set.
  Corel Image set, Image Auto-Annotation, Support Vector Machine (SVM)
  384-389
  
    
      Tang, Jiayu
      
        4f9409ac-830d-4937-867d-e06c76b8a4e1
      
     
  
    
      Lewis, Paul
      
        7aa6c6d9-bc69-4e19-b2ac-a6e20558c020
      
     
  
  
   
  
  
    
      March 2007
    
    
  
  
    
      Tang, Jiayu
      
        4f9409ac-830d-4937-867d-e06c76b8a4e1
      
     
  
    
      Lewis, Paul
      
        7aa6c6d9-bc69-4e19-b2ac-a6e20558c020
      
     
  
       
    
 
  
    
      
  
  
  
  
  
  
    Tang, Jiayu and Lewis, Paul
  
  
  
  
   
    (2007)
  
  
    
    A Study of Quality Issues for Image Auto-Annotation with the Corel Data-Set.
  
  
  
  
    IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, Vol. 1 (NO. 3), .
  
   
  
  
   
  
  
  
  
  
   
  
    
    
      
        
          Abstract
          The Corel Image set is widely used for image annotation performance evaluation although it has been claimed that Corel images are relatively easy to annotate. The aim of this paper is to demonstrate some of the disadvantages of data-sets like the Corel set for effective auto-annotation evaluation. We first compare the performance of several annotation algorithms using the Corel set and find that simple near neighbour propagation techniques perform fairly well. A Support Vector Machine (SVM) based annotation method achieves even better results, almost as good as the best found in the literature. We then build a new image collection using the Yahoo Image Search engine and query-by-single-word searches to create a more challenging annotated set automatically. Then, using three very different image annotation methods, we demonstrate some of the problems of annotation using the Corel set compared with the Yahoo based training set. In both cases the training sets are used to create a set of annotations for the Corel test set.
         
      
      
    
   
  
  
  More information
  
    
      Published date: March 2007
 
    
  
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
  
    
     
        Keywords:
        Corel Image set, Image Auto-Annotation, Support Vector Machine (SVM)
      
    
  
    
     
        Organisations:
        Web & Internet Science
      
    
  
    
  
  
  
    
  
  
        Identifiers
        Local EPrints ID: 263437
        URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/263437
        
        
        
        
          PURE UUID: de93d994-7994-4866-a3ab-c5690f454008
        
  
    
        
          
        
    
        
          
            
          
        
    
  
  Catalogue record
  Date deposited: 15 Feb 2007
  Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 07:32
  Export record
  
  
 
 
  
    
    
      Contributors
      
          
          Author:
          
            
            
              Jiayu Tang
            
          
        
      
          
          Author:
          
            
              
              
                Paul Lewis
              
              
            
            
          
        
      
      
      
    
  
   
  
    Download statistics
    
      Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
      
      View more statistics