The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Development of metallic digital strain gauges

Development of metallic digital strain gauges
Development of metallic digital strain gauges
Metallic resistive strain gauges are widely used in measuring devices for physical quantities such as load, pressure and torque. The gauges are bonded to the surface of the sensing structure at strategic points to obtain an appropriate level of strain. Typically in a load cell the strains at the gauges do not exceed 1500 microstrain at the rated load. With a four-gauge fully active Wheatstone bridge circuit, a nominal output signal is about 3 mV/V of bridge excitation for the maximum level of 1500 microstrain at the full load, based upon a gauge factor of 2. If the bridge excitation voltage is 10 V, which is determined by the gauge resistance, the gauge grid area and the heat-sink characteristics of the load cell material, the maximum output voltage of the bridge at the full load will be about 30 mV. Despite many favourable factors of the metallic resistive strain gauges, the limiting factors are that the output signals are quite low and very often the measurement accuracy is limited by the signal-to-noise ratio. Also the installation of strain gauges is normally labour intensive. Furthermore, to obtain a measurable output signal, the surface strain is usually designed to approach the proportional elastic limit of the sensing structure. For this reason strain-gauges-based load cells can seldom withstand overloads of more than double the rated full range load. Strain gauges have for many years been the primary sensors in the fields of measurement for load, pressure and torque. However, some instrument manufacturers of load, pressure and torque measurement devices have moved away from using resistive strain gauges. Since early 1980’s, Shinko Denshi Co. Ltd. has developed metallic resonant tuning fork balance and since early 1990’s, Avery Berkel and Weigh-Tronix (now Avery Weigh-Tronix) have developed quartz resonant tuning fork weighing scales, and Druck Ltd has developed silicon resonant pressure sensors. Further commercial developments are taking place to enhance device manufacturability, to enable wireless/batteryless operation of the resonant sensors, and to make measurement on stiff structures at much lower strain levels possible.
A resonant sensor is a device with an element vibrating at resonance of which the resonance frequency is a function of the measurand. The output of a resonant sensor is a quasi-digital frequency signal, which does not require accurate measurement of the amplitude of the analogue voltage signal. The frequency signal is compatible with digital circuitry eliminating the need for analogue-to-digital conversion. The resolution achievable using a resonant sensor is much higher than alternative strain gauge sensors as the frequency can be measured with greater accuracy, for example the resonance frequency of the quartz tuning fork in watches is used as an accurate time base. Resonant sensors also have good long-term stability since the resonance frequency is not dependent on the amplitude of the electrical signals, but rather the mechanical properties of the sensor element. Resonator sensors often have a high mechanical quality factor (Q-factor), which leads to a high sensitivity and low power consumption. Resonant sensors have been made in a wide range of types, sizes and materials. This paper reports upon the development of metallic resonant sensors based on a triple-beam tuning fork structure with thick-film printed piezoelectric elements.
Trans Tech Publications Ltd
Yan, T.
9cfff593-08c6-4487-bda6-f866ea2cf648
Jones, B.
3c7d1997-4778-43b1-bfc7-2890dddd49fd
Rakowski, R.
b9144fb2-6ae8-44b9-a2af-126764a9a1a8
Tudor, M.
46eea408-2246-4aa0-8b44-86169ed601ff
Beeby, S.
ba565001-2812-4300-89f1-fe5a437ecb0d
White, N.
c7be4c26-e419-4e5c-9420-09fc02e2ac9c
Lucas, B
Yan, T.
9cfff593-08c6-4487-bda6-f866ea2cf648
Jones, B.
3c7d1997-4778-43b1-bfc7-2890dddd49fd
Rakowski, R.
b9144fb2-6ae8-44b9-a2af-126764a9a1a8
Tudor, M.
46eea408-2246-4aa0-8b44-86169ed601ff
Beeby, S.
ba565001-2812-4300-89f1-fe5a437ecb0d
White, N.
c7be4c26-e419-4e5c-9420-09fc02e2ac9c
Lucas, B

Yan, T., Jones, B., Rakowski, R., Tudor, M., Beeby, S. and White, N. (2004) Development of metallic digital strain gauges. Lucas, B (ed.) In Advances in Experimental Mechanics. Trans Tech Publications Ltd..

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)

Abstract

Metallic resistive strain gauges are widely used in measuring devices for physical quantities such as load, pressure and torque. The gauges are bonded to the surface of the sensing structure at strategic points to obtain an appropriate level of strain. Typically in a load cell the strains at the gauges do not exceed 1500 microstrain at the rated load. With a four-gauge fully active Wheatstone bridge circuit, a nominal output signal is about 3 mV/V of bridge excitation for the maximum level of 1500 microstrain at the full load, based upon a gauge factor of 2. If the bridge excitation voltage is 10 V, which is determined by the gauge resistance, the gauge grid area and the heat-sink characteristics of the load cell material, the maximum output voltage of the bridge at the full load will be about 30 mV. Despite many favourable factors of the metallic resistive strain gauges, the limiting factors are that the output signals are quite low and very often the measurement accuracy is limited by the signal-to-noise ratio. Also the installation of strain gauges is normally labour intensive. Furthermore, to obtain a measurable output signal, the surface strain is usually designed to approach the proportional elastic limit of the sensing structure. For this reason strain-gauges-based load cells can seldom withstand overloads of more than double the rated full range load. Strain gauges have for many years been the primary sensors in the fields of measurement for load, pressure and torque. However, some instrument manufacturers of load, pressure and torque measurement devices have moved away from using resistive strain gauges. Since early 1980’s, Shinko Denshi Co. Ltd. has developed metallic resonant tuning fork balance and since early 1990’s, Avery Berkel and Weigh-Tronix (now Avery Weigh-Tronix) have developed quartz resonant tuning fork weighing scales, and Druck Ltd has developed silicon resonant pressure sensors. Further commercial developments are taking place to enhance device manufacturability, to enable wireless/batteryless operation of the resonant sensors, and to make measurement on stiff structures at much lower strain levels possible.
A resonant sensor is a device with an element vibrating at resonance of which the resonance frequency is a function of the measurand. The output of a resonant sensor is a quasi-digital frequency signal, which does not require accurate measurement of the amplitude of the analogue voltage signal. The frequency signal is compatible with digital circuitry eliminating the need for analogue-to-digital conversion. The resolution achievable using a resonant sensor is much higher than alternative strain gauge sensors as the frequency can be measured with greater accuracy, for example the resonance frequency of the quartz tuning fork in watches is used as an accurate time base. Resonant sensors also have good long-term stability since the resonance frequency is not dependent on the amplitude of the electrical signals, but rather the mechanical properties of the sensor element. Resonator sensors often have a high mechanical quality factor (Q-factor), which leads to a high sensitivity and low power consumption. Resonant sensors have been made in a wide range of types, sizes and materials. This paper reports upon the development of metallic resonant sensors based on a triple-beam tuning fork structure with thick-film printed piezoelectric elements.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2004
Venue - Dates: International Conference on Advances in Experimental Mechanics, , York, United Kingdom, 2004-09-06 - 2004-09-08
Organisations: EEE

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 263789
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/263789
PURE UUID: ba0bffe8-1e19-4fd6-8355-4e66af190896
ORCID for M. Tudor: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1179-9455
ORCID for S. Beeby: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-0800-1759
ORCID for N. White: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0003-1532-6452

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Mar 2007
Last modified: 08 Dec 2023 02:34

Export record

Contributors

Author: T. Yan
Author: B. Jones
Author: R. Rakowski
Author: M. Tudor ORCID iD
Author: S. Beeby ORCID iD
Author: N. White ORCID iD
Editor: B Lucas

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×