Analytical electric field and sensitivity analysis for two microfluidic impedance cytometer designs
Analytical electric field and sensitivity analysis for two microfluidic impedance cytometer designs
Microfabricated impedance cytometers have been developed to measure the electrical impedance of single biological particles at high speed. A general approach to analytically solve the electric field distributions for two different designs of cytometers: parallel facing electrodes and coplanar electrodes, using the Schwarz–Christoffel Mapping method is presented. Compared to previous analytical solutions, our derivations are more systematic and solutions are more straightforward. The solutions have been validated by comparison with numerical simulations performed using the finite element method. The influences on the electric field distribution due to the variations in the geometry of the devices have been discussed. A simple method is used to determine the impedance sensitivity of the system and to compare the two electrode designs. For identical geometrical parameters, we conclude that the parallel electrodes design is more sensitive than the coplanar electrodes.
69-79
Sun, Tao
b2f8e932-a7e6-4fe7-94dd-5c4ce725eacb
Green, Nicolas G
d9b47269-c426-41fd-a41d-5f4579faa581
Gawad, Shady
98f746a7-4bcc-42bb-a450-dafda85be29c
Morgan, Hywel
de00d59f-a5a2-48c4-a99a-1d5dd7854174
2007
Sun, Tao
b2f8e932-a7e6-4fe7-94dd-5c4ce725eacb
Green, Nicolas G
d9b47269-c426-41fd-a41d-5f4579faa581
Gawad, Shady
98f746a7-4bcc-42bb-a450-dafda85be29c
Morgan, Hywel
de00d59f-a5a2-48c4-a99a-1d5dd7854174
Sun, Tao, Green, Nicolas G, Gawad, Shady and Morgan, Hywel
(2007)
Analytical electric field and sensitivity analysis for two microfluidic impedance cytometer designs.
IET Nanobiotechnology, 1 (5), .
(doi:10.1049/iet-nbt:20070019).
Abstract
Microfabricated impedance cytometers have been developed to measure the electrical impedance of single biological particles at high speed. A general approach to analytically solve the electric field distributions for two different designs of cytometers: parallel facing electrodes and coplanar electrodes, using the Schwarz–Christoffel Mapping method is presented. Compared to previous analytical solutions, our derivations are more systematic and solutions are more straightforward. The solutions have been validated by comparison with numerical simulations performed using the finite element method. The influences on the electric field distribution due to the variations in the geometry of the devices have been discussed. A simple method is used to determine the impedance sensitivity of the system and to compare the two electrode designs. For identical geometrical parameters, we conclude that the parallel electrodes design is more sensitive than the coplanar electrodes.
Text
J40_Sun_Green_Gawad_Morgan_IET_Bionanotechnology_2007.pdf
- Other
More information
Published date: 2007
Organisations:
Electronics & Computer Science
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 264424
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/264424
ISSN: 1751-8741
PURE UUID: 7fba18c1-d7ed-40bc-8cc3-6617d50fe2b7
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 21 Aug 2007
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 03:20
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Tao Sun
Author:
Nicolas G Green
Author:
Shady Gawad
Author:
Hywel Morgan
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics