Confidentiality and serious harm in genetics - preserving the confidentiality of one patient and preventing harm to relatives
Confidentiality and serious harm in genetics - preserving the confidentiality of one patient and preventing harm to relatives
Genetics can pose special challenges to the principle of confidentiality within the health professional-patient relationship, since genetic information is by its nature both individual and familial. Most professional guidelines allow confidentiality to be broken in rare circumstances, where it will prevent a 'serious', 'imminent' and 'likely' harm. We argue that the types of harms that may result from genetic medicine are particularly diverse. Using clinical examples, we explore ethical issues that arise when balancing individual and family member interests. As genetic testing becomes more, widespread situations will arise where clinicians are faced with a choice between preserving the confidentiality of one patient and preventing harm to another. Professionals need to incorporate the notion of familial implications in their counseling of individuals. Since such dilemmas have been relatively rare in the pre-genetic age, we call for a wider debate on the balance between confidentiality and harm to others.
confidentiality, disclosure, autonomy, familial, clinical genetics, predictive testing, consent
93-97
Lucassen, Anneke
2eb85efc-c6e8-4c3f-b963-0290f6c038a5
Parker, Michael
f08fdd2b-3c14-472f-b222-0ced5bb71bd4
February 2004
Lucassen, Anneke
2eb85efc-c6e8-4c3f-b963-0290f6c038a5
Parker, Michael
f08fdd2b-3c14-472f-b222-0ced5bb71bd4
Lucassen, Anneke and Parker, Michael
(2004)
Confidentiality and serious harm in genetics - preserving the confidentiality of one patient and preventing harm to relatives.
European Journal of Human Genetics, 12 (2), .
(doi:10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201118).
Abstract
Genetics can pose special challenges to the principle of confidentiality within the health professional-patient relationship, since genetic information is by its nature both individual and familial. Most professional guidelines allow confidentiality to be broken in rare circumstances, where it will prevent a 'serious', 'imminent' and 'likely' harm. We argue that the types of harms that may result from genetic medicine are particularly diverse. Using clinical examples, we explore ethical issues that arise when balancing individual and family member interests. As genetic testing becomes more, widespread situations will arise where clinicians are faced with a choice between preserving the confidentiality of one patient and preventing harm to another. Professionals need to incorporate the notion of familial implications in their counseling of individuals. Since such dilemmas have been relatively rare in the pre-genetic age, we call for a wider debate on the balance between confidentiality and harm to others.
Text
26447.pdf
- Version of Record
Restricted to Repository staff only
Request a copy
More information
Submitted date: 9 July 2003
Published date: February 2004
Keywords:
confidentiality, disclosure, autonomy, familial, clinical genetics, predictive testing, consent
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 26447
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/26447
ISSN: 1018-4813
PURE UUID: e2116d4d-a20f-4566-b13f-0a15bfe0f7c5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 20 Apr 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 03:23
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Michael Parker
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics