Sexual negotiation in the AIDS era: negotiated safety revisited
Sexual negotiation in the AIDS era: negotiated safety revisited
Objective: To test the safety of the 'negotiated safety' strategy - the strategy of dispensing with condoms within HIV-seronegative concordant regular sexual relationships under certain conditions. Method: Data from a recently recruited cohort of homosexually active men (Sydney Men and Sexual Health cohort, n = 1037) are used to revisit negotiated safety. The men were surveyed using a structured questionnaire and questions addressing their sexual relationships and practice, their own and their regular partner's serostatus, agreements entered into by the men concerning sexual practice within and outside their regular relationship, and contextual and demographic variables. Results: The findings indicate that a significant number of men used negotiated safety as an HIV prevention strategy. In the 6 months prior to interview, of the 181 men in seroconcordant HIV-negative regular relationships, 62% had engaged in unprotected anal intercourse within their relationship, and 91% (165 men) had not engaged in unprotected anal intercourse outside their relationship. Of these 165 men, 82% had negotiated agreements about sex outside their relationship. The safety of negotiation was dependent not only on seroconcordance but also on the presence of an agreement; 82% of the men who had not engaged in unprotected anal intercourse outside their regular relationship had entered into an agreement with their partner, whereas only 56% of those who had engaged in unprotected anal intercourse had an agreement. The safety of negotiation was also related to the nature of the safety agreement reached between the men and on the acceptability of condoms. Agreements between HIV-negative seroconcordant regular partners prohibiting anal intercourse with casual partners or any form of sex with a casual partner were typically complied with, and men who had such negotiated agreements were at low risk of HIV infection. Conclusions: The adoption of the strategy of negotiated safety among men in HIV-seronegative regular relationships may help such men sustain the safety of their sexual practice.
191-197
Kippax, S
6fa7184f-2f5e-4189-b50c-cbdfe406fd2b
Noble, J.
440f07ba-dbb8-4d66-b969-36cde4e3b764
Prestage, G.
ea0b51b9-9e50-4e01-8bcd-30c2b7523bcd
Crawford, J.
311abfb9-8fc7-4662-86c0-c18292c045c2
Campbell, D.
cc755472-8e95-4b57-aa55-aceddb7c7b2f
Baxter, D.
a2b7ae27-9abf-4765-8eb2-9fa663a39f53
Cooper, D.
4ef5e04b-5b11-4ef3-b61c-49498b7edf4d
1997
Kippax, S
6fa7184f-2f5e-4189-b50c-cbdfe406fd2b
Noble, J.
440f07ba-dbb8-4d66-b969-36cde4e3b764
Prestage, G.
ea0b51b9-9e50-4e01-8bcd-30c2b7523bcd
Crawford, J.
311abfb9-8fc7-4662-86c0-c18292c045c2
Campbell, D.
cc755472-8e95-4b57-aa55-aceddb7c7b2f
Baxter, D.
a2b7ae27-9abf-4765-8eb2-9fa663a39f53
Cooper, D.
4ef5e04b-5b11-4ef3-b61c-49498b7edf4d
Kippax, S, Noble, J., Prestage, G., Crawford, J., Campbell, D., Baxter, D. and Cooper, D.
(1997)
Sexual negotiation in the AIDS era: negotiated safety revisited.
AIDS, 11 (2), .
Abstract
Objective: To test the safety of the 'negotiated safety' strategy - the strategy of dispensing with condoms within HIV-seronegative concordant regular sexual relationships under certain conditions. Method: Data from a recently recruited cohort of homosexually active men (Sydney Men and Sexual Health cohort, n = 1037) are used to revisit negotiated safety. The men were surveyed using a structured questionnaire and questions addressing their sexual relationships and practice, their own and their regular partner's serostatus, agreements entered into by the men concerning sexual practice within and outside their regular relationship, and contextual and demographic variables. Results: The findings indicate that a significant number of men used negotiated safety as an HIV prevention strategy. In the 6 months prior to interview, of the 181 men in seroconcordant HIV-negative regular relationships, 62% had engaged in unprotected anal intercourse within their relationship, and 91% (165 men) had not engaged in unprotected anal intercourse outside their relationship. Of these 165 men, 82% had negotiated agreements about sex outside their relationship. The safety of negotiation was dependent not only on seroconcordance but also on the presence of an agreement; 82% of the men who had not engaged in unprotected anal intercourse outside their regular relationship had entered into an agreement with their partner, whereas only 56% of those who had engaged in unprotected anal intercourse had an agreement. The safety of negotiation was also related to the nature of the safety agreement reached between the men and on the acceptability of condoms. Agreements between HIV-negative seroconcordant regular partners prohibiting anal intercourse with casual partners or any form of sex with a casual partner were typically complied with, and men who had such negotiated agreements were at low risk of HIV infection. Conclusions: The adoption of the strategy of negotiated safety among men in HIV-seronegative regular relationships may help such men sustain the safety of their sexual practice.
Text
negotiatedSafetyRevisited.pdf
- Other
More information
Published date: 1997
Organisations:
Agents, Interactions & Complexity
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 265234
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/265234
PURE UUID: 92f7d630-94d4-4ec1-a3e4-679a6aeb34a7
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 29 Feb 2008 17:09
Last modified: 14 Mar 2024 08:05
Export record
Contributors
Author:
S Kippax
Author:
J. Noble
Author:
G. Prestage
Author:
J. Crawford
Author:
D. Campbell
Author:
D. Baxter
Author:
D. Cooper
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics