The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

How To Integrate University and Funder Open Access Mandates

Record type: Monograph (Project Report)

Research funder open-access mandates (such as NIH's) and university open-access mandates (such as Harvard's) are complementary. There is a simple way to integrate them to make them synergistic and mutually reinforcing: Universities' own Institutional Repositories (IRs) are the natural locus for the direct deposit of their own research output: Universities are the research providers and have a direct interest in archiving, monitoring, measuring, evaluating, and showcasing their own research assets -- as well as in maximizing their uptake, usage and impact. Both universities and funders should accordingly mandate deposit of all peer-reviewed final drafts (postprints), in each author's own university IR, immediately upon acceptance for publication, for institutional and funder record-keeping purposes. Access to that immediate postprint deposit in the author's university IR may be set immediately as Open Access if copyright conditions allow; otherwise access can be set as Closed Access, pending copyright negotiations or embargoes. All the rest of the conditions described by universities and funders should accordingly apply only to the timing and copyright conditions for setting open access to those deposits, not to the depositing itself, its locus or its timing. As a result, (1) there will be a common deposit locus for all research output worldwide; (2) university mandates will reinforce and monitor compliance with funder mandates; (3) funder mandates will reinforce university mandates; (4) legal details concerning open-access provision, copyright and embargoes will be applied independently of deposit itself, on a case by case basis, according to the conditions of each mandate; (5) opt-outs will apply only to copyright negotiations, not to deposit itself, nor its timing; and (6) any central OA repositories can then harvest the postprints from the authors' IRs under the agreed conditions at the agreed time, if they wish.

HTML harvard-nih.html - Other
Download (12kB)

Citation

Harnad, Stevan (2008) How To Integrate University and Funder Open Access Mandates s.n.

More information

Accepted/In Press date: 2 March 2008
Additional Information: Commentary On: http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~secfas/February_2008_Agenda.pdf
Keywords: open access, research policy, institutional repositories, deposit mandates, research impact, Harvard, NIH
Organisations: Web & Internet Science

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 265265
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/265265
PURE UUID: 3bc3534d-65ab-4b18-bc66-07733d85d873

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 04 Mar 2008 01:58
Last modified: 18 Jul 2017 07:27

Export record

Contributors

Author: Stevan Harnad

University divisions


Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×