Institutional versus Central Deposit Optimising DRIVER Policy for the OA Mandate and Metric Era


Harnad, Stevan (2008) Institutional versus Central Deposit Optimising DRIVER Policy for the OA Mandate and Metric Era At European Network for the Advancement of Artificial Cognitive Systems, Workshop on Social Cognition,, Germany. 16 - 17 Jan 2008.

Download

[img] Video (QuickTime) harnad-driver.mov - Other
Available under License Other.

Download (24MB)

Description/Abstract

Funder central deposit mandates (like NIH) do not scale They cannot systematically cover all of research output Not all research is funded But all research originates from a university or research institution Disciplines criss-cross research space, arbitrarily and redundantly Researchers have multiple funders, publish in multiple disciplines Institutions systematically cover all of research space, in all disciplines All OA repositories are interoperable Hence both funders and institutions should mandate institutional deposit Then the deposits can be harvested centrally wherever else desired DEPOSIT INSTITUTIONALLY HARVEST CENTRALLY

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Other)
Additional Information: Invited Keynote Speaker, First DRIVER Summit, Goettingen, Germany, 16-17 January 2008 http://www.driver-support.eu/multi/DRIVERSummit.php Event Dates: 16-17 January 2008
Venue - Dates: European Network for the Advancement of Artificial Cognitive Systems, Workshop on Social Cognition,, Germany, 2008-01-16 - 2008-01-17
Related URLs:
Keywords: institutional repositories, open access, central vs institutional deposit, mandates, metrics, self-archiving
Organisations: Web & Internet Science
ePrint ID: 265696
Date :
Date Event
10 January 2008Accepted/In Press
Date Deposited: 09 May 2008 00:55
Last Modified: 17 Apr 2017 19:15
Further Information:Google Scholar
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/265696

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item