The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Screening for familial ovarian cancer: failure of current protocols to detect ovarian cancer at an early stage according to The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics System.

Screening for familial ovarian cancer: failure of current protocols to detect ovarian cancer at an early stage according to The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics System.
Screening for familial ovarian cancer: failure of current protocols to detect ovarian cancer at an early stage according to The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics System.
Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of annual ovarian cancer screening (transvaginal ultrasound and serum CA-125 estimation) in detecting presymptomatic ovarian cancer in women at increased genetic risk.
Patients and Methods: A cohort of 1,110 women at increased risk of ovarian cancer were screened between January 1991 and March 2004; 553 were moderate-risk individuals (4% to 10% lifetime risk) and 557 were high-risk individuals (> 10% lifetime risk). Outcome measurements include the number and stage of screen-detected cancers, the number and stage of cancers not detected at screening, the number of equivocal screening results requiring recall/repetition, and the number of women undergoing surgery for benign disease.
Results: Thirteen epithelial ovarian malignancies (12 invasive and one borderline), developed in the cohort. Ten tumors were detected at screening: three International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I (including borderline), two stage II, four stage III, and one stage IV. Of the three cancers not detected by screening, two were stage III and one was stage IV; 29 women underwent diagnostic surgery but were found not to have ovarian cancer.
Conclusion: Annual surveillance by transvaginal ultrasound scanning and serum CA-125 measurement in women at increased familial risk of ovarian cancer is ineffective in detecting tumors at a sufficiently early stage to influence prognosis. With a positive predictive value of 17% and a sensitivity of less than 50%, the performance of ultrasound does not satisfy the WHO screening standards. In addition, the combined protocol has a particularly high false-positive rate in premenopausal women, leading to unnecessary surgical intervention.
1527-7755
5588-5596
Stirling, Diane
8fd42986-61ab-49d2-b504-cf25e0720f4a
Evans, D. Gareth
314acefb-89fb-4eb7-a0e7-0a6949c9af6c
Pichert, Gabriella
2f767134-7791-42b4-9b80-50e978ab2495
Shenton, Andrew
58787a93-3640-419d-8767-fd446ee4c222
Kirk, Elaine N.
915e34ea-e4e3-40c8-91b8-2747a01ef8bd
Rimmer, Sylvia
52c535d0-b791-4c9f-9d8c-b08132f2719b
Steel, C. Michael
a68bafc7-571b-4deb-b763-3ec5c8073808
Lawson, Sheila
e8a4a489-c0a6-4d9e-b071-d172b1a06ff1
Busby-Earle, R. M. Camille
da0b2a8a-4aef-4c7b-945c-d182359ad27f
Walker, Jane
fd514b7f-9f67-424c-a56a-e1751feccce9
Lalloo, Fiona I.
0979eb02-bf6a-40b9-8d44-517946e79ea5
Eccles, Diana M.
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Lucassen, Anneke M.
1fad5211-3a31-40da-a9c5-1d1d8662d5f4
Porteous, Mary E.
05990ca3-1e88-43d9-983f-d1853589433b
Stirling, Diane
8fd42986-61ab-49d2-b504-cf25e0720f4a
Evans, D. Gareth
314acefb-89fb-4eb7-a0e7-0a6949c9af6c
Pichert, Gabriella
2f767134-7791-42b4-9b80-50e978ab2495
Shenton, Andrew
58787a93-3640-419d-8767-fd446ee4c222
Kirk, Elaine N.
915e34ea-e4e3-40c8-91b8-2747a01ef8bd
Rimmer, Sylvia
52c535d0-b791-4c9f-9d8c-b08132f2719b
Steel, C. Michael
a68bafc7-571b-4deb-b763-3ec5c8073808
Lawson, Sheila
e8a4a489-c0a6-4d9e-b071-d172b1a06ff1
Busby-Earle, R. M. Camille
da0b2a8a-4aef-4c7b-945c-d182359ad27f
Walker, Jane
fd514b7f-9f67-424c-a56a-e1751feccce9
Lalloo, Fiona I.
0979eb02-bf6a-40b9-8d44-517946e79ea5
Eccles, Diana M.
5b59bc73-11c9-4cf0-a9d5-7a8e523eee23
Lucassen, Anneke M.
1fad5211-3a31-40da-a9c5-1d1d8662d5f4
Porteous, Mary E.
05990ca3-1e88-43d9-983f-d1853589433b

Stirling, Diane, Evans, D. Gareth, Pichert, Gabriella, Shenton, Andrew, Kirk, Elaine N., Rimmer, Sylvia, Steel, C. Michael, Lawson, Sheila, Busby-Earle, R. M. Camille, Walker, Jane, Lalloo, Fiona I., Eccles, Diana M., Lucassen, Anneke M. and Porteous, Mary E. (2005) Screening for familial ovarian cancer: failure of current protocols to detect ovarian cancer at an early stage according to The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics System. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 23 (24), 5588-5596. (doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.05.097).

Record type: Article

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the effectiveness of annual ovarian cancer screening (transvaginal ultrasound and serum CA-125 estimation) in detecting presymptomatic ovarian cancer in women at increased genetic risk.
Patients and Methods: A cohort of 1,110 women at increased risk of ovarian cancer were screened between January 1991 and March 2004; 553 were moderate-risk individuals (4% to 10% lifetime risk) and 557 were high-risk individuals (> 10% lifetime risk). Outcome measurements include the number and stage of screen-detected cancers, the number and stage of cancers not detected at screening, the number of equivocal screening results requiring recall/repetition, and the number of women undergoing surgery for benign disease.
Results: Thirteen epithelial ovarian malignancies (12 invasive and one borderline), developed in the cohort. Ten tumors were detected at screening: three International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I (including borderline), two stage II, four stage III, and one stage IV. Of the three cancers not detected by screening, two were stage III and one was stage IV; 29 women underwent diagnostic surgery but were found not to have ovarian cancer.
Conclusion: Annual surveillance by transvaginal ultrasound scanning and serum CA-125 measurement in women at increased familial risk of ovarian cancer is ineffective in detecting tumors at a sufficiently early stage to influence prognosis. With a positive predictive value of 17% and a sensitivity of less than 50%, the performance of ultrasound does not satisfy the WHO screening standards. In addition, the combined protocol has a particularly high false-positive rate in premenopausal women, leading to unnecessary surgical intervention.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2005

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 26622
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/26622
ISSN: 1527-7755
PURE UUID: 119c8caa-0335-4330-8edc-4b11030054c7
ORCID for Diana M. Eccles: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-9935-3169

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 10 Apr 2006
Last modified: 16 Mar 2024 02:39

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: Diane Stirling
Author: D. Gareth Evans
Author: Gabriella Pichert
Author: Andrew Shenton
Author: Elaine N. Kirk
Author: Sylvia Rimmer
Author: C. Michael Steel
Author: Sheila Lawson
Author: R. M. Camille Busby-Earle
Author: Jane Walker
Author: Fiona I. Lalloo
Author: Diana M. Eccles ORCID iD
Author: Anneke M. Lucassen
Author: Mary E. Porteous

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×