Flexible agreement mechanism for dynamic meaning negotiation
Flexible agreement mechanism for dynamic meaning negotiation
Effective communication in open environments relies on the ability of agents to reach a mutual understanding of the exchanged message by reconciling the vocabulary (ontology) used. Various approaches have considered how mutually acceptable mappings between corresponding concepts in the agents' own ontologies may be determined dynamically through argumentation-based negotiation (such as Meaning-based Argumentation). We demonstrate that the existing argument generation procedure causes the agents to pose overly restrictive arguments. Thus, a more relaxed argument procedure is proposed whereby the agents are allowed to express a private threshold for each individual value. We empirically demonstrate that the relaxed argument generation procedure produces larger agreed alignments. Furthermore, the alignments are fitter for purpose, better enabling agent communication, than the alignments obtained with the existing strict argument generation procedure and are comparable to the alignments obtained when the agents accept all the proposed mappings.
Palmisano, Ignazio
0d76daba-ac1d-44ee-9417-7076870b7b34
Doran, Paul
00225971-b083-444b-9566-8f3f86570591
Tamma, Valentina
5b302cae-5ff6-4f29-afa7-6d9dc2f73329
Payne, Terry
0bb13d45-2735-45a3-b72c-472fddbd0bb4
2010
Palmisano, Ignazio
0d76daba-ac1d-44ee-9417-7076870b7b34
Doran, Paul
00225971-b083-444b-9566-8f3f86570591
Tamma, Valentina
5b302cae-5ff6-4f29-afa7-6d9dc2f73329
Payne, Terry
0bb13d45-2735-45a3-b72c-472fddbd0bb4
Palmisano, Ignazio, Doran, Paul, Tamma, Valentina and Payne, Terry
(2010)
Flexible agreement mechanism for dynamic meaning negotiation.
The 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Toronto, Canada.
Record type:
Conference or Workshop Item
(Poster)
Abstract
Effective communication in open environments relies on the ability of agents to reach a mutual understanding of the exchanged message by reconciling the vocabulary (ontology) used. Various approaches have considered how mutually acceptable mappings between corresponding concepts in the agents' own ontologies may be determined dynamically through argumentation-based negotiation (such as Meaning-based Argumentation). We demonstrate that the existing argument generation procedure causes the agents to pose overly restrictive arguments. Thus, a more relaxed argument procedure is proposed whereby the agents are allowed to express a private threshold for each individual value. We empirically demonstrate that the relaxed argument generation procedure produces larger agreed alignments. Furthermore, the alignments are fitter for purpose, better enabling agent communication, than the alignments obtained with the existing strict argument generation procedure and are comparable to the alignments obtained when the agents accept all the proposed mappings.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2010
Venue - Dates:
The 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Toronto, Canada, 2010-04-30
Organisations:
Electronics & Computer Science
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 268380
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/268380
PURE UUID: d3ab8711-03cc-4190-a840-8fb4fcb66ade
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 14 Jan 2010 17:18
Last modified: 10 Dec 2021 23:08
Export record
Contributors
Author:
Ignazio Palmisano
Author:
Paul Doran
Author:
Valentina Tamma
Author:
Terry Payne
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics