The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Modifications of upper limb muscle synergies in post-stroke patients during rehabilitation based on functional electrical stimulation

Modifications of upper limb muscle synergies in post-stroke patients during rehabilitation based on functional electrical stimulation
Modifications of upper limb muscle synergies in post-stroke patients during rehabilitation based on functional electrical stimulation
AIM: Previous experiments have suggested that the CNS may coordinate muscle activations through a linear combination of muscle synergies. Neurological diseases influence motor recruitment and, consequently, modify muscle synergies. Our purpose was to understand the modifications induced by Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) in post stroke patients during upper limb rehabilitation. To this aim we compared muscle synergies pre and post intervention. METHODS: Five chronic stroke participants undertook nine tracking tasks in a planar robot in which trajectory (orientation and length), duration, speed and resistance were varied. Error in target tracking was corrected by electrical stimulation of the triceps muscle. Timing and level of stimulation was adjusted using iterative learning control algorithms. EMG signals were collected at 1500 Hz from 7 upper arm and shoulder muscles (Biceps BIC; Anterior Deltoid DEL_A; Pectoralis major PEC_M; Trapezius, upper TRAP_UPP, medial TRAP_MED, lower TRAP_LOW; Triceps TRI), both before and after 18 treatment sessions. The same EMG data was collected under the same conditions with 8 neurologically intact participants on a single occasion. Raw data were rectified, low-pass-filtered (Butterworth, 4th ord., 20 Hz) and normalized to their maximal values. Muscle synergies were extracted using the Non-Negative Matrix Factorization algorithm. Differences in weight coefficients and timing patterns between the groups have been respectively evaluated by means of their scalar product and their correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Preliminary results showed statistically significant differences between muscle synergies extracted from impaired and healthy subjects. However, despite of improved motor performance following the intervention, there were no statistically significant changes in muscle synergies. CONCLUSION: The present study shows that muscle synergies in chronic stroke patients differ from normal but are not modified by this intervention. Concomitant improvement in motor performance in the absence of significant normalisation of muscle synergies implies reinforcement of residual motor strategies acquired after stroke. Improvement in functional may be through compensation rather than true recovery and potentially demand a greater energy cost.
Tropea, Peppino
fe17ee95-4d06-41e1-9df1-5ff101d9ae3e
Freeman, Chris
ccdd1272-cdc7-43fb-a1bb-b1ef0bdf5815
Hughes, Ann-Marie
11239f51-de47-4445-9a0d-5b82ddc11dea
Burridge, Jane
7c453775-c3ae-4d55-99af-2ed8600ca680
Micera, Silvestro
779ac3e9-5ae8-4d91-b787-b71ad11f7421
Tropea, Peppino
fe17ee95-4d06-41e1-9df1-5ff101d9ae3e
Freeman, Chris
ccdd1272-cdc7-43fb-a1bb-b1ef0bdf5815
Hughes, Ann-Marie
11239f51-de47-4445-9a0d-5b82ddc11dea
Burridge, Jane
7c453775-c3ae-4d55-99af-2ed8600ca680
Micera, Silvestro
779ac3e9-5ae8-4d91-b787-b71ad11f7421

Tropea, Peppino, Freeman, Chris, Hughes, Ann-Marie, Burridge, Jane and Micera, Silvestro (2010) Modifications of upper limb muscle synergies in post-stroke patients during rehabilitation based on functional electrical stimulation. The XVIII Congress of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, Aalborg, Denmark.

Record type: Conference or Workshop Item (Poster)

Abstract

AIM: Previous experiments have suggested that the CNS may coordinate muscle activations through a linear combination of muscle synergies. Neurological diseases influence motor recruitment and, consequently, modify muscle synergies. Our purpose was to understand the modifications induced by Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) in post stroke patients during upper limb rehabilitation. To this aim we compared muscle synergies pre and post intervention. METHODS: Five chronic stroke participants undertook nine tracking tasks in a planar robot in which trajectory (orientation and length), duration, speed and resistance were varied. Error in target tracking was corrected by electrical stimulation of the triceps muscle. Timing and level of stimulation was adjusted using iterative learning control algorithms. EMG signals were collected at 1500 Hz from 7 upper arm and shoulder muscles (Biceps BIC; Anterior Deltoid DEL_A; Pectoralis major PEC_M; Trapezius, upper TRAP_UPP, medial TRAP_MED, lower TRAP_LOW; Triceps TRI), both before and after 18 treatment sessions. The same EMG data was collected under the same conditions with 8 neurologically intact participants on a single occasion. Raw data were rectified, low-pass-filtered (Butterworth, 4th ord., 20 Hz) and normalized to their maximal values. Muscle synergies were extracted using the Non-Negative Matrix Factorization algorithm. Differences in weight coefficients and timing patterns between the groups have been respectively evaluated by means of their scalar product and their correlation coefficients. RESULTS: Preliminary results showed statistically significant differences between muscle synergies extracted from impaired and healthy subjects. However, despite of improved motor performance following the intervention, there were no statistically significant changes in muscle synergies. CONCLUSION: The present study shows that muscle synergies in chronic stroke patients differ from normal but are not modified by this intervention. Concomitant improvement in motor performance in the absence of significant normalisation of muscle synergies implies reinforcement of residual motor strategies acquired after stroke. Improvement in functional may be through compensation rather than true recovery and potentially demand a greater energy cost.

Text
Tropea_isek2010_southampton.pdf - Author's Original
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (890kB)
Request a copy

More information

Submitted date: January 2010
Published date: 19 June 2010
Additional Information: Event Dates: 16-19th June
Venue - Dates: The XVIII Congress of the International Society of Electrophysiology and Kinesiology, Aalborg, Denmark, 2010-06-19
Organisations: EEE

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 268457
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/268457
PURE UUID: 1c1307a4-d2db-466f-a274-73afc398b050
ORCID for Ann-Marie Hughes: ORCID iD orcid.org/0000-0002-3958-8206

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 02 Feb 2010 17:50
Last modified: 19 Nov 2024 02:40

Export record

Contributors

Author: Peppino Tropea
Author: Chris Freeman
Author: Jane Burridge
Author: Silvestro Micera

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×