The University of Southampton
University of Southampton Institutional Repository

Polymorphic CYP2C19 and N-acetylation: human variability in kinetics and pathway-related uncertainty factors

Polymorphic CYP2C19 and N-acetylation: human variability in kinetics and pathway-related uncertainty factors
Polymorphic CYP2C19 and N-acetylation: human variability in kinetics and pathway-related uncertainty factors
CYP2C19-mediated oxidation and N-acetylation constitute major phase I and phase II polymorphic pathways of xenobiotic metabolism in humans. Analysis of human variability in kinetics for these pathways has been carried out for compounds metabolised extensively (>60%) by these routes. Data for minor substrates for CYP2C19 metabolism (10–60%) have also been analysed. Published pharmacokinetic studies (after oral and intravenous dosing) in CYP2C19 non-phenotyped healthy adults (NPs), and phenotyped extensive (EMs), slow-extensive (SEMs) and poor metabolisers (PMs) have been analysed using data for parameters that relate primarily to chronic exposure (metabolic and total clearances, area under the plasma concentration–time curve) and primarily to acute exposure (peak concentration). Similar analyses were performed for the N-acetylation pathway using data for fast acetylators (FA) and slow acetylators (SA). Interindividual variability in the kinetics of CYP2C19 substrates after oral dosage was greater in EMs than in NPs (60 vs 43% for clearances and 54 vs 45% for Cmax). Lower variability was found for N-acetylation for both phenotypes (32 and 22% for FA and SA, respectively). The internal dose of CYP2C19 substrates in PM subjects would be 31-fold higher than in EMs, while for N-acetylated substrates there was a three-fold difference between SA and FA subjects. Pathway-related uncertainty factors were above the default safety factor of 3.16 for most subgroups and values of 52 and 5.2 would be necessary to cover to the 99th centile of the poor metaboliser phenotype for CYP2C19 and N-acetylation, respectively. An exponential relationship (R²=0.86) was found between the extent of CYP2C19 metabolism and the difference in internal dose between EMs and PMs. The kinetic default factor (3.16) would cover PMs for substrates for which CYP2C19 was responsible for up to 20–30% of the metabolism in EMs.
Human variability, Pharmacokinetics, CYP2C19, N-acetylation, Uncertainty factors, Risk assessment, Sensitive subgroups
0278-6915
225-245
Dorne, J.L.C.M.
bb24d5c7-c4fd-445a-9785-0a03d216fdc2
Walton, K.
024c9ff2-0a40-4fda-a213-db73d9971871
Renwick, A.G.
596705ab-5418-4e02-9ad7-c4309326df46
Dorne, J.L.C.M.
bb24d5c7-c4fd-445a-9785-0a03d216fdc2
Walton, K.
024c9ff2-0a40-4fda-a213-db73d9971871
Renwick, A.G.
596705ab-5418-4e02-9ad7-c4309326df46

Dorne, J.L.C.M., Walton, K. and Renwick, A.G. (2003) Polymorphic CYP2C19 and N-acetylation: human variability in kinetics and pathway-related uncertainty factors. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 41 (2), 225-245. (doi:10.1016/S0278-6915(02)00210-7).

Record type: Article

Abstract

CYP2C19-mediated oxidation and N-acetylation constitute major phase I and phase II polymorphic pathways of xenobiotic metabolism in humans. Analysis of human variability in kinetics for these pathways has been carried out for compounds metabolised extensively (>60%) by these routes. Data for minor substrates for CYP2C19 metabolism (10–60%) have also been analysed. Published pharmacokinetic studies (after oral and intravenous dosing) in CYP2C19 non-phenotyped healthy adults (NPs), and phenotyped extensive (EMs), slow-extensive (SEMs) and poor metabolisers (PMs) have been analysed using data for parameters that relate primarily to chronic exposure (metabolic and total clearances, area under the plasma concentration–time curve) and primarily to acute exposure (peak concentration). Similar analyses were performed for the N-acetylation pathway using data for fast acetylators (FA) and slow acetylators (SA). Interindividual variability in the kinetics of CYP2C19 substrates after oral dosage was greater in EMs than in NPs (60 vs 43% for clearances and 54 vs 45% for Cmax). Lower variability was found for N-acetylation for both phenotypes (32 and 22% for FA and SA, respectively). The internal dose of CYP2C19 substrates in PM subjects would be 31-fold higher than in EMs, while for N-acetylated substrates there was a three-fold difference between SA and FA subjects. Pathway-related uncertainty factors were above the default safety factor of 3.16 for most subgroups and values of 52 and 5.2 would be necessary to cover to the 99th centile of the poor metaboliser phenotype for CYP2C19 and N-acetylation, respectively. An exponential relationship (R²=0.86) was found between the extent of CYP2C19 metabolism and the difference in internal dose between EMs and PMs. The kinetic default factor (3.16) would cover PMs for substrates for which CYP2C19 was responsible for up to 20–30% of the metabolism in EMs.

This record has no associated files available for download.

More information

Published date: 2003
Keywords: Human variability, Pharmacokinetics, CYP2C19, N-acetylation, Uncertainty factors, Risk assessment, Sensitive subgroups

Identifiers

Local EPrints ID: 27029
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/27029
ISSN: 0278-6915
PURE UUID: 2eafb048-84cd-49b7-80c9-7d21fdbaadd8

Catalogue record

Date deposited: 28 Apr 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:15

Export record

Altmetrics

Contributors

Author: J.L.C.M. Dorne
Author: K. Walton
Author: A.G. Renwick

Download statistics

Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.

View more statistics

Atom RSS 1.0 RSS 2.0

Contact ePrints Soton: eprints@soton.ac.uk

ePrints Soton supports OAI 2.0 with a base URL of http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/cgi/oai2

This repository has been built using EPrints software, developed at the University of Southampton, but available to everyone to use.

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue without changing your settings, we will assume that you are happy to receive cookies on the University of Southampton website.

×