Cost-effectiveness of interferon ? or peginterferon ?, with ribavirin for histologically mild chronic hepatitis C
Cost-effectiveness of interferon ? or peginterferon ?, with ribavirin for histologically mild chronic hepatitis C
Background: For patients with mild chronic hepatitis C the cost-effectiveness of antiviral therapy is unknown.
Aims: To assess whether anti-viral therapy (either interferon α or peginterferon α combined with ribavirin) is cost-effective at a mild stage compared to waiting and only treating those cases who progress to moderate disease.
Patients: Cases with mild chronic hepatitis C.
Methods: A cost-effectiveness model estimates long-term costs and outcomes for patients with mild chronic hepatitis C. The model uses effectiveness and cost data from the UK mild hepatitis C RCT, combined with estimates of disease progression and cost from observational studies.
Results: Antiviral treatment at a mild rather than a moderate stage improved outcomes measured by Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) gained. The mean cost per QALY gained from antiviral treatment with interferon α-2b and ribavirin, compared to no treatment at a mild stage, was £4,535 ($7,108) for patients with genotype non-1 and £25,188 ($39,480) for patients with genotype 1. Providing peginterferon α-2b and ribavirin at a mild rather than a moderate stage was also associated with a gain in QALYs; the costs per QALY gained were £7,821 ($12,259) for patients with genotype non-1 and £28,409 ($44,528) for patients with genotype 1.
Conclusions: For patients with chronic hepatitis C, it is generally more cost-effective to provide antiviral treatment at a mild rather than a moderate disease stage. For older patients (aged 65 or over) with genotype 1, antiviral treatment at a mild stage is not cost-effective.
cost-effectiveness model, cost analysis, antiviral therapy
1332-1338
Grieve, Richard
f540f134-ede0-4b15-99be-ecf369f272dc
Roberts, Jennifer
1d31a9d7-24db-4570-bc05-5c7fd45853a1
Wright, Mark
c9b1b302-436a-40d3-b3ea-456002f82248
Sweeting, Michael
dc1d9e1b-4cd6-485a-b327-910d3431c173
DeAngelis, Daniela
5684982a-ba74-4359-8104-7d82dfa976ae
Rosenberg, William
cea47565-06a3-4622-931c-aa5a7686865c
Bassendine, Margaret
4b1ad9f5-9ea8-48bf-8eeb-baebce194101
Main, Janice
2e46c50b-fb7f-48c2-bd7c-cb697c4531d6
Thomas, Howard
6d14c164-8b2f-4e89-bd41-18974c0fafa2
2006
Grieve, Richard
f540f134-ede0-4b15-99be-ecf369f272dc
Roberts, Jennifer
1d31a9d7-24db-4570-bc05-5c7fd45853a1
Wright, Mark
c9b1b302-436a-40d3-b3ea-456002f82248
Sweeting, Michael
dc1d9e1b-4cd6-485a-b327-910d3431c173
DeAngelis, Daniela
5684982a-ba74-4359-8104-7d82dfa976ae
Rosenberg, William
cea47565-06a3-4622-931c-aa5a7686865c
Bassendine, Margaret
4b1ad9f5-9ea8-48bf-8eeb-baebce194101
Main, Janice
2e46c50b-fb7f-48c2-bd7c-cb697c4531d6
Thomas, Howard
6d14c164-8b2f-4e89-bd41-18974c0fafa2
Grieve, Richard, Roberts, Jennifer, Wright, Mark, Sweeting, Michael, DeAngelis, Daniela, Rosenberg, William, Bassendine, Margaret, Main, Janice and Thomas, Howard
(2006)
Cost-effectiveness of interferon ? or peginterferon ?, with ribavirin for histologically mild chronic hepatitis C.
Gut, 55 (9), .
(doi:10.1136/gut.2005.064774).
Abstract
Background: For patients with mild chronic hepatitis C the cost-effectiveness of antiviral therapy is unknown.
Aims: To assess whether anti-viral therapy (either interferon α or peginterferon α combined with ribavirin) is cost-effective at a mild stage compared to waiting and only treating those cases who progress to moderate disease.
Patients: Cases with mild chronic hepatitis C.
Methods: A cost-effectiveness model estimates long-term costs and outcomes for patients with mild chronic hepatitis C. The model uses effectiveness and cost data from the UK mild hepatitis C RCT, combined with estimates of disease progression and cost from observational studies.
Results: Antiviral treatment at a mild rather than a moderate stage improved outcomes measured by Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) gained. The mean cost per QALY gained from antiviral treatment with interferon α-2b and ribavirin, compared to no treatment at a mild stage, was £4,535 ($7,108) for patients with genotype non-1 and £25,188 ($39,480) for patients with genotype 1. Providing peginterferon α-2b and ribavirin at a mild rather than a moderate stage was also associated with a gain in QALYs; the costs per QALY gained were £7,821 ($12,259) for patients with genotype non-1 and £28,409 ($44,528) for patients with genotype 1.
Conclusions: For patients with chronic hepatitis C, it is generally more cost-effective to provide antiviral treatment at a mild rather than a moderate disease stage. For older patients (aged 65 or over) with genotype 1, antiviral treatment at a mild stage is not cost-effective.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2006
Keywords:
cost-effectiveness model, cost analysis, antiviral therapy
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 27074
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/27074
ISSN: 0017-5749
PURE UUID: 5655188d-e032-4c3e-9754-7c0dfdeb78d5
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 25 Apr 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:15
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
Richard Grieve
Author:
Jennifer Roberts
Author:
Mark Wright
Author:
Michael Sweeting
Author:
Daniela DeAngelis
Author:
William Rosenberg
Author:
Margaret Bassendine
Author:
Janice Main
Author:
Howard Thomas
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics