Detection of meningococcal carriage by culture and PCR of throat swabs and mouth gargles
Detection of meningococcal carriage by culture and PCR of throat swabs and mouth gargles
The standard method for detecting meningococcal carriage is culture of throat swabs on selective media, but the levels of carriage determined depend heavily on the skills of the individuals taking the swab and interpreting the cultures. This study aimed to determine the most sensitive detection method for meningococcal carriage. Throat swabs and saline mouth gargles, obtained from 89 university students, were processed in parallel by conventional culture and TaqMan ctrA PCR. Carriage of meningococci, as detected by the combined methods, was 20%.
The sensitivities of throat swab culture, throat swab PCR, gargle culture, and gargle PCR were 72, 56, 56, and 50%, respectively, and the probabilities that these techniques would correctly identify the absence of carriage (negative predictive value [NPV]) were 93.4, 89.9, 89.9, and 88.8%. Culturing both throat swabs and gargles increased the NPV to 98.6%. The further addition of throat swab PCR increased this to 100%. Testing gargles by both culture and PCR was as sensitive as testing throat swabs by both methods, suggesting that gargles may be a suitable alternative for large-scale screening studies when throat swabs are difficult to obtain, although they required more lengthy laboratory processing. PCR was a useful adjunct to culture for detecting nasopharyngeal carriage, but it failed to detect some nongroupable strains. For maximum sensitivity, a combination of techniques was required. This study indicates the confidence with which health care professionals involved in meningococcal screening can regard laboratory results.
75-79
Jordens, J. Zoe
48609270-e8d1-4edd-8d9f-ead58137a296
Williams, Jeannette N.
14e675d9-8b05-4650-b01a-c52e73e903f4
Jones, Graeme R.
c8160cbd-efdb-476e-a95a-82301c69a4ae
Heckels, John E.
fcfcfafe-5ca8-4728-9c5e-cb67f9af7e31
2002
Jordens, J. Zoe
48609270-e8d1-4edd-8d9f-ead58137a296
Williams, Jeannette N.
14e675d9-8b05-4650-b01a-c52e73e903f4
Jones, Graeme R.
c8160cbd-efdb-476e-a95a-82301c69a4ae
Heckels, John E.
fcfcfafe-5ca8-4728-9c5e-cb67f9af7e31
Jordens, J. Zoe, Williams, Jeannette N., Jones, Graeme R. and Heckels, John E.
(2002)
Detection of meningococcal carriage by culture and PCR of throat swabs and mouth gargles.
Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 40, .
(doi:10.1128/JCM.40.1.75-79.2002).
Abstract
The standard method for detecting meningococcal carriage is culture of throat swabs on selective media, but the levels of carriage determined depend heavily on the skills of the individuals taking the swab and interpreting the cultures. This study aimed to determine the most sensitive detection method for meningococcal carriage. Throat swabs and saline mouth gargles, obtained from 89 university students, were processed in parallel by conventional culture and TaqMan ctrA PCR. Carriage of meningococci, as detected by the combined methods, was 20%.
The sensitivities of throat swab culture, throat swab PCR, gargle culture, and gargle PCR were 72, 56, 56, and 50%, respectively, and the probabilities that these techniques would correctly identify the absence of carriage (negative predictive value [NPV]) were 93.4, 89.9, 89.9, and 88.8%. Culturing both throat swabs and gargles increased the NPV to 98.6%. The further addition of throat swab PCR increased this to 100%. Testing gargles by both culture and PCR was as sensitive as testing throat swabs by both methods, suggesting that gargles may be a suitable alternative for large-scale screening studies when throat swabs are difficult to obtain, although they required more lengthy laboratory processing. PCR was a useful adjunct to culture for detecting nasopharyngeal carriage, but it failed to detect some nongroupable strains. For maximum sensitivity, a combination of techniques was required. This study indicates the confidence with which health care professionals involved in meningococcal screening can regard laboratory results.
This record has no associated files available for download.
More information
Published date: 2002
Identifiers
Local EPrints ID: 27191
URI: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/27191
ISSN: 0095-1137
PURE UUID: b9dfc8ca-6cf9-4aaf-a2eb-34adab1dc6ae
Catalogue record
Date deposited: 27 Apr 2006
Last modified: 15 Mar 2024 07:16
Export record
Altmetrics
Contributors
Author:
J. Zoe Jordens
Author:
Jeannette N. Williams
Author:
Graeme R. Jones
Download statistics
Downloads from ePrints over the past year. Other digital versions may also be available to download e.g. from the publisher's website.
View more statistics